Re: [cssparser-developers] Subversion

[D&J G. <djg...@gm...>]

+1

I'd much rather work in SVN than in CVS.

On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Alan Krueger <al...@tr...> wrote:

> (The question was asked earlier, but in the middle of another message.
> I'll restate the question to ensure it doesn't get missed.)
>
> Does anyone object to using Subversion for our source control?  We can't
> use both SVN and CVS at the same time.  We would have to enable SVN,
> convert our existing CVS repository into SVN, then import that into SF's
> SVN repository.
>
> It takes a bit of work, but it should be easy to back out if something
> went wrong in the conversion process.  I'm in favor of Subversion
> myself, I've found it quite a bit easier to use than CVS and more
> powerful.
>
> Thanks,
> Alan
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> cssparser-developers mailing list
> css...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cssparser-developers
>



-- 
Daniel Gredler
http://daniel.gredler.net/