Re: [css2xslfo-support] [csstoxslfo] Problem with page-break

[Andreas J. <li...@zo...>]

--On 29. Juni 2007 19:37:21 +0200 Werner Donn=C3=A9 <wer...@re...> =
wrote:

> Hi Andreas,
>
> Making the filtering optional would render the tool non-compliant
> again. However, I can introduce a post-processing filter for Xinc
> like there is one for the old FOP already. In there, the conversion
> could be made. This conversion should then also be added to the
> old FOP post-processor, because it doesn't implement the property
> either. This is consistent with the fact that Xinc is based on the
> old FOP.
>

Since I have a separation between the html->fo and fo->something
conversion I added yet another replacement to my FO fixing code.
No need for further changes on your side.

Thanks,
Andreas