Re: [css2xslfo-support] Link around image not possible?

[Erik T. <er...@so...>]

Hi Werner,

Thank you for your explanation, I can probably fake full image link 
coverage by fooling around with large font sizes.

Kind regards,

Erik.

Werner Donn wrote:
> Hi Erik,
>
> Just now I tested it with both FOP and XEP4 and the results are the same.
> There is a link around the image, but only the bottom part of it is
> sensitive. Hover the image and you will see only the area equal to the
> line height at the bottom is sensitive.
>
> I think this stems from the fact that the "img" element is an inline 
> element.
> The display type of "img" is "graphic", which is treated as inline. 
> This is
> consistent with the XSL-FO element "external-graphic" being an inline 
> element.
>
> The area of the image that is in the line is covered by the link. Put 
> some text
> before are after it to see it. I'm afraid this is a difference in 
> behaviour
> between CSS and XSL-FO. In fact CSS2 doesn't specify anything about 
> images.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Werner.
>
> On 17 Sep 2009, at 11:58, Erik Terpstra wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> It looks like it is not possible to put a link around an image?
>> Like: <a href="..."><img src="..."/></a>
>> Is there some way to get this to work? Or am I doing something wrong?
>> I am using Apache FOP as the back-end.
>>
>> TIA,
>>
>> Erik.
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
>>
>> Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
>> is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
>> developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and 
>> stay
>> ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9&#45;12, 2009. Register 
>> now&#33;
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
>> _______________________________________________
>> css2xslfo-support mailing list
>> css...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/css2xslfo-support
>
> -- 
> http://www.pincette.biz/
> Handling your documents with care, wherever you are.
>