Re: [css2xslfo-support] Observations

[<aro...@cl...>]

Oops!

Sorry, I meant to say the 60kb file in the paragraph below. The 16kb one 
without carriage returns was fine in both Oxygen and TextWrangler.

-- Aaron

aro...@cl... wrote on 16-10-2008 03:07:21 PM:

> 
> Hi Brad, 
> 
> That's good to know :-) 
> 
> Question, with the multi-meg files, are there any carriage returns? 
> That *might* be a clue. 
> 
> The 16kb file xml source file I have does not have any carriage 
> returns. I noticed when I opened it in "Oxygen" it gave a message 
> saying that the length was too long and that it had to reformat the 
> file and add hard returns before displaying it. Also, with 
> "TextWranger", I couldn't edit the file past a certain point without
> adding "soft returns" to the document. 
> 
> Brad, would it be relatively easy to remove all carriage returns and
> try running a multi-meg file through its paces? 
> 
> Cheers, 
> -- Aaron 
> 
> Brad Clements <bk...@mu...> wrote on 16-10-2008 02:41:29 PM:
> 
> > All I can add to this is that we routinely generate PDFs that are 3 or 
4 
> > megs of output, whose source file is quite a bit larger than 16kb.
> > 
> > Maybe there's some kind of rendering overflow that's not related to 
the 
> > size of the input file, but rather how the contents are being 
rendered.
> > 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's 
challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great 
prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the 
world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> css2xslfo-support mailing list
> css...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/css2xslfo-support