Menu

#255 No Audio on Samsung Vibrant SGH-T959

WrongConfig
nobody
None
Medium
Defect
2010-10-06
2010-10-01
Anonymous
No

Originally created by: danbor...@gmail.com
Originally owned by: r3gis...@gmail.com

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Making a Call

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
I can place calls, the other party can hear me, but I can not hear them.

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
CSipSimple_0.00-13-02.apk
OS Android 2.1

Please provide any additional information below.
Using TMobile Samsung Galaxy S Vibrant, US model,. Using over WiFi.
My VoIP Sevice provide is Inphonex.

Related

Tickets: #264

Discussion

  • Anonymous

    Anonymous - 2010-10-01

    Originally posted by: r3gis...@gmail.com

    There is mainly two possible causes on this kind of issues :
    * The variant of this Samsung i9000 has another audio implementation than the one I tested on Galaxy S -and that work. However samsung as such an awful audio implementation on this series... that I would not be so much astonished.
    * Something goes wrong with the network and/or configuration.

    To test if it's the first point, you should maybe try to enable/disable speaker and hold/resume call and see how things goes if nothing is observed, probably something with the second point.
    So, if the second one, maybe setting a stun server could help :
    Go on setting Settings > Network - Tick Use Stun and fill a stun server on the field bellow. You can use whatever stun server you want it's not necessarily linked to your provider. See http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/STUN Public Stun server section.
    If it doesn't work, you can also try to use ICE.
    If none of this tests helps, you should maybe ensure that there is no firewall between your device and the other party ( or your router doesn't route things).

    And finally, you could send me logs (see on the wiki, there is a page about HowToCollectLogs), so that I can maybe understand more what is happening.

    What would be really interesting for me too is whether you tried with another android sip phone with the same configuration and the same remote party.

    Owner: r3gis.3R
    Status: Accepted

     
  • Anonymous

    Anonymous - 2010-10-01

    Originally posted by: danbor...@gmail.com

    After following your instructions, it is now working.
    I Had to add a STUN server and turn ICE on. I can hear with no problem now,
    however the voice quality incoming and outgoing was OK, little choppy, even after activating the options to prevent that on the settings menu, I guess it is because of the low bitrate codec, my Voip Phone Service(Inphonex) supports only 3 codecs available on csipsimple, PCMU, PCMA and ilibc.

    Iphonex Supports: G711, G729, G726, G723, ILIBC, GSM,
    So it would be nice to see some of the higher bitrate codecs that will work with my service provider in future versions of csipsimple.

    Thank you for your support.

     
  • Anonymous

    Anonymous - 2010-10-01

    Originally posted by: r3gis...@gmail.com

    Great
    Well csipsimple already support a lot of codecs. You can configure their priorities in settings, media, codecs
    Pcmu =g711
    Pcma = g711a
    There is also ilbc, gsm, speex,g722...
    I have something that work with g729, but I don't want to publish it now due to licensing issues I have with this codec. G726 is planned but will not improve things in your situation.
    I get some really good results with ilbc. But you have to ensure that it I is actually the codec chosen on the sip negotiation. So while in call use the i button to see what is the current codec. You can try to disable some codecs in settings if your server always choose pcmu/a. Long click on a codec to do so.

    Status: WrongConfig

     
  • Anonymous

    Anonymous - 2010-10-02

    Originally posted by: danbor...@gmail.com

    I missed GSM on the csipsimple codec list, and actually GSM worked best of all, but for some reason, GSM and ILIBC does not work when I make calls to Brazil, it works when I make local calls in USA. only PCMA and PCMU works calling Brazil, but the quality is terrible.

    Thank you.

     
  • Anonymous

    Anonymous - 2010-10-03

    Originally posted by: r3gis...@gmail.com

    If GSM & iLBC doesn't work for call to Brazil, two cause are possible :

    * The remote party actually support gsm & iLBC, but prefer pcmu. If so, you can try to disable pcmu/pcma from the codec list (long click & Deactivate on a codec row).
    If it's actually unsupported by the remote party, you'll see call "Connecting" and will directly hangup, since codec negotiation has failed. If it succeed, you are probably having a call that use a codec within the non disabled codec list :).

    * The remote party or your gateway server (if it's a pstn call) doesn't support these codecs. If so nothing, unfortunately, can be done in CSipSimple to help.
    However, if you get a bad sound quality (I mean choppy sound) with G711, it mean that your network (or more precisely the network between you and the remote party), is not good enough. It's confirmed by the fact using GSM makes things better on local : GSM use a lower bandwidth than G711.
    On a good network CSipSimple provide a good call quality (tested and validated by many people here ;) ). I guess that with your and your remote party network you'll not find any sip application that make the call quality good enough.
    If you are interested in codec stuff, you can read this http://www.speex.org/comparison/ comparison. CPU usage is not shown on this table, but with your galaxy i9000, will not has a big impact.

     
  • Anonymous

    Anonymous - 2010-10-04

    Originally posted by: fles...@gmail.com

    I'm testing csipsimple using my galaxy s i9000 (original firmware).
    First I couldn't hear the other party at all, but the other party hear me perfectly.
    When starting a call, I could see a speaker symbol with a crossing line, at the top (like a no sound symbol).
    After enabling STUN, I started hearing the other party! BUT... the "no audio" symbol still appears.

    r3gis, sorry for my beginner question ... but could you explain me why should I enable STUN to get it working?

    CSipSimple is the fist app working "almost" perfectly! Congratulation for the amazing work!

     
  • Anonymous

    Anonymous - 2010-10-04

    Originally posted by: r3gis...@gmail.com

    As for the "no sound" icon, it just mean that the ringer mode is now muted. It's to avoid GSM phone ringing while you are in a SIP call and avoid to destroy your ear ;).

    You need stun because you are probably under a NATed network (with some routers between you and your server/the remote party).
    STUN is a service that allow your SIP client to know its public IP and so allow your remote contact or server to send you audio packets. If it's not activated, it's possible that you (your sip client) announce a IP that is unreachable by the remote party... So the remote party will try to send you packet to an IP that it can't reach... and this packets will be lost in the network :)

    So under certain network configuration -usually with 3G when data is carried by your carrier- stun or Turn or ICE are needed.

     
  • Anonymous

    Anonymous - 2010-10-04

    Originally posted by: fles...@gmail.com

    Now I got it! :) Thanks.
    I forgot I was using wifi!

    I've got to agree with you, samsung did a poor job with the audio/mic
    system in the i9000 (it's a shame because the rest of the phone is very
    good).
    One thing I noticed is that the other party can't hear me the way I hear
    them. I can hear well, but when I talk, my voice get there broken. When they talk they get a horrible echo too. It doesn't happen only with csipsimple, it
    happens with all others voip apps.
    I think it's because the poor mic i9000 has. It's too sensitive and too
    loud... I really don't know.
    I will have to wait for froyo 2.2 update to see if samsung will fix this
    system.

    Until there... I don't know what I can do to have a good voip app running
    in this phone. You're are the one who is getting close, but I think samsung is not colaborating with you! :)

     
  • Anonymous

    Anonymous - 2010-10-04

    Originally posted by: r3gis...@gmail.com

    For echo issue you should read issue 259. There is good settings that should help a little bit.

    That's now included as default parameter in 0.00-13-04 but will not erase your existing settings if you have csipsimple already installed. So you can either uninstall and reinstall version -13-04 or set settings listed in issue 259 by hand and say me how it goes :).

    For the micro in fact they used Alsa (a well known linux driver on this mobile). However the implementation of Alsa in android (not done by samsung) doesn't behaves as a standard developer would have expect. Besides they did something really crappy with audio routes that doesn't make things better :).

    But your right, the rest of the phone is amazing .... still prefer my Nexus One since more up to date but I'm hesitating in buying one galaxyS... besides would be easier to test on ;)

     

    Related

    Tickets: #259

  • Anonymous

    Anonymous - 2010-10-04

    Originally posted by: fles...@gmail.com

    Wow!! Amazing!! Now I can hear and the other party can hear me too!! Perfect!

    One more doubt. After installing 0.00-13-04 I went on setting to check the Mic/Speaker amplification values and both was set as 1. Based on the values posted on issue 259, I'm not sure if you apply these values internally or not, but I manually changed even after 0.00-13-04. Is it necessary?

    Thanks again r3gis! I can't believe it's working!

     

    Related

    Tickets: #259

  • Anonymous

    Anonymous - 2010-10-04

    Originally posted by: r3gis...@gmail.com

    If you do an upgrade I'll not change the existing values. If it is a new install ( if you uninstall it before installing the new version) default values should be set to values of issue 259. At least it should be else let me know.
    But yes if it is an upgrade I will not change any settings.

     

    Related

    Tickets: #259

  • Anonymous

    Anonymous - 2010-10-05

    Originally posted by: fles...@gmail.com

    I've uninstalled before installing again. Even doing this the default values was 1.
    Maybe it's because my phone is the brazilian version (I9000B). If you set defaults based on model number, probably that's the reason.

     
  • Anonymous

    Anonymous - 2010-10-05

    Originally posted by: r3gis...@gmail.com

    Indeed could be a reason. I'm based on the "device" field :
    android.os.Build.DEVICE.equals("GT-I9000")

    I'd like to know the model of your phone to be able to support it too. If you can install for example DeviceInfo available on the market and say me what is the device name, could help me a lot. Thx in advance

     
  • Anonymous

    Anonymous - 2010-10-05

    Originally posted by: fles...@gmail.com

    GT-I9000B
    Instead using "equals" you could check if the string starts with "GT-I9000".
    I believe that the diference between worldwide models is the last letter.

     
  • Anonymous

    Anonymous - 2010-10-06

    Originally posted by: danbor...@gmail.com

    Hello r3gis.3R,
    FYI: Going back to my previous post about call quality to brazil using inphonex service provider, I called them and they told me most of phone providers in brazil uses g729 codec, thats why I was having such a terrible experience making calls internationally.
    Making calls here in US, quality is crystal clear.

    Do you know when you're going to have G729 support in CSIPSIMPLE?

    Thanks for providing such a great app.

     
  • Anonymous

    Anonymous - 2010-10-06

    Originally posted by: r3gis...@gmail.com

    G729 is now just a license and distribution issue. Code is functional...
    So it will be available once I'll get time to find a good way to distribute it respecting the g729 license. See issue 8
    I have to admit that I'm more confident in coding stuff than in lawyers and proprietary licenses stuff....
    If only g729 license where compatible with gpl distribution it could have been already included....

     

    Related

    Tickets: #8


Log in to post a comment.