Hello John, I see that for this project, the Git access is enabled (git clone git://git.code.sf.net/p/cs-prolog/code cs-prolog-code), but the repository appears to be empty (no commits on the master branch).
You also created a GitHub repository https://github.com/JohnPool/CSharpProlog which is equally empty, and https://github.com/jsakamoto/CSharpProlog did the work of importing the version 4.1 source code. Is that the latest version of the code? Do you plan of populating your repositories with the canonical source code? I think it would really help if there is one canonical version everybody can branch of and request changes to be merged back into. It seems that jsakamoto did a fantastic job of supporting .NET stuff like NuGet etc. Note that git could be using both this sourceforge repository and the one(s) on GitHub, i.e. they are not exclusive.
Any ideas?
Regards,
Sebastian
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Fact is that I never had any involvement in copying C#Prolog stuff from
SourceForge to GitHub. I guess that has all been done by mr. Sakamoto. Not
that I have any objections against that, on the contrary, if it makes it
easier to branch and merge etc. and make specific versions, then I can only
welcome that.
But my problem is that my time to dive into this and to spend more time on
C#Prolog is very limited, as I moved on to other projects. Also, I am not
very fluent with Git(Hub) etc. If you or anyone else wants to set up what
you propose, please feel free to do so. If you need my help for something
specific, please let me know.
Does this help?
Kind regards,
John
Van: Sebastian Godelet [mailto:sebgod@users.sf.net]
Verzonden: Tuesday, December 29, 2015 02:00
Aan: [cs-prolog:discussion]668615@discussion.cs-prolog.p.re.sf.net
Onderwerp: [cs-prolog:discussion] Git repository
Hello John, I see that for this project, the Git access is enabled (git
clone git://git.code.sf.net/p/cs-prolog/code cs-prolog-code), but the
repository appears to be empty (no commits on the master branch).
You also created a GitHub repository https://github.com/JohnPool/CSharpProlog which is equally empty, and https://github.com/jsakamoto/CSharpProlog did the work of importing the
version 4.1 source code. Is that the latest version of the code? Do you plan
of populating your repositories with the canonical source code? I think it
would really help if there is one canonical version everybody can branch of
and request changes to be merged back into. It seems that jsakamoto did a
fantastic job of supporting .NET stuff like NuGet etc. Note that git could
be using both this sourceforge repository and the one(s) on GitHub, i.e.
they are not exclusive.
Any ideas?
Dear Paul,
is it possible to have read-only access to the primary git repository?
Would make sending patches much easier
yep. would be great source appeared in git repo somewhere, better on gitlab.
I will sort that out. I have no experience with git(lab) but I will look at it.
Hello John, I see that for this project, the Git access is enabled (git clone git://git.code.sf.net/p/cs-prolog/code cs-prolog-code), but the repository appears to be empty (no commits on the master branch).
You also created a GitHub repository https://github.com/JohnPool/CSharpProlog which is equally empty, and https://github.com/jsakamoto/CSharpProlog did the work of importing the version 4.1 source code. Is that the latest version of the code? Do you plan of populating your repositories with the canonical source code? I think it would really help if there is one canonical version everybody can branch of and request changes to be merged back into. It seems that jsakamoto did a fantastic job of supporting .NET stuff like NuGet etc. Note that git could be using both this sourceforge repository and the one(s) on GitHub, i.e. they are not exclusive.
Any ideas?
Regards,
Sebastian
Hello Sebastian,
Sorry for answering so late.
Fact is that I never had any involvement in copying C#Prolog stuff from
SourceForge to GitHub. I guess that has all been done by mr. Sakamoto. Not
that I have any objections against that, on the contrary, if it makes it
easier to branch and merge etc. and make specific versions, then I can only
welcome that.
But my problem is that my time to dive into this and to spend more time on
C#Prolog is very limited, as I moved on to other projects. Also, I am not
very fluent with Git(Hub) etc. If you or anyone else wants to set up what
you propose, please feel free to do so. If you need my help for something
specific, please let me know.
Does this help?
Kind regards,
John
Van: Sebastian Godelet [mailto:sebgod@users.sf.net]
Verzonden: Tuesday, December 29, 2015 02:00
Aan: [cs-prolog:discussion] 668615@discussion.cs-prolog.p.re.sf.net
Onderwerp: [cs-prolog:discussion] Git repository
Hello John, I see that for this project, the Git access is enabled (git
clone git://git.code.sf.net/p/cs-prolog/code cs-prolog-code), but the
repository appears to be empty (no commits on the master branch).
You also created a GitHub repository
https://github.com/JohnPool/CSharpProlog which is equally empty, and
https://github.com/jsakamoto/CSharpProlog did the work of importing the
version 4.1 source code. Is that the latest version of the code? Do you plan
of populating your repositories with the canonical source code? I think it
would really help if there is one canonical version everybody can branch of
and request changes to be merged back into. It seems that jsakamoto did a
fantastic job of supporting .NET stuff like NuGet etc. Note that git could
be using both this sourceforge repository and the one(s) on GitHub, i.e.
they are not exclusive.
Any ideas?
Regards,
Sebastian
Git repository
https://sourceforge.net/p/cs-prolog/discussion/668615/thread/5d69cbb6/?limi t=25#4cf2
Sent from sourceforge.net because you indicated interest in
https://sourceforge.net/p/cs-prolog/discussion/668615/
To unsubscribe from further messages, please visit
https://sourceforge.net/auth/subscriptions/
Dit e-mailbericht is gecontroleerd op virussen met Avast antivirussoftware.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Hey, thanks for the reply. I'll stick to that version then :) I find on GitHub it much easier to collaborate.
Veel succes!