Re: [CryptoAPI-devel] Is keeping the patches available through theSF.net "Files" section beneficial?

[Herbert V. R. <hv...@hv...>]

On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Justin Clift wrote:

> I can see what you mean with that.  Sounds like the web-page needs to
> have a few more links, as I don't think we can put links from the
> "Files" section on the sourceforge site.
> 
> I don't understand why we can't have the the patches signed with the gpg
> kernel.org signature, wherever they are for download.  Then again, I
> haven't used gpg which probably explains why.  :)
...silly me, the sigs can just be copied from kernel.org C:-)

...forget that argument... :)

there's only one thing now... the API changed a little bit for the 
unofficial testing patches, and only now has changed back to a backward 
compatible means... so please wait a little bit before adding files...

regards,
-- 
Herbert Valerio Riedel       /    Phone: (EUROPE) +43-1-58801-18840
Email: hv...@hv...       /    Finger hv...@gn... for GnuPG Public Key
GnuPG Key Fingerprint: 7BB9 2D6C D485 CE64 4748  5F65 4981 E064 883F 4142