Re: [CryptoAPI-devel] Is keeping the patches available through the SF.net "Files" section beneficial?

[Kyle M. <ky...@de...>]

On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 10:15:00PM +0100, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote:
> well, in order to do so, we should convince them in the first place,
> that cryptoapi's cryptoloop and the crypotapi itself is a mature piece
> of code...
> 
i guess making the ciphers endian independant is the first issue...

> the unclear state of maintenance has earned this project a bad
> reputation; and jari's negative press (which only in part was true)
> hasn't helped much either... 
> 
i have a question about this, does cryptoapi replace kernel-int or does
kernel-int still exist?

> on the other hand, we have the benefit of being the more or less
> official crypto extension for the linux kernel... should we lose this as
> well, we can give up completely... :-/
> 
nod, i guess we'll have to make sure it doesn't :)

  - k

-- 
copyleft (c) 2002, Kyle McMartin