[CryptoAPI-devel] Is keeping the patches available through the SF.net "Files" section beneficial?

[Justin C. <ju...@po...>]

Hi everyone,

I've volunteered to help out the CryptoAPI project by taking the time to
put the CryptoAPI patches in the SourceForge sites' "Files" section so
people can download them directly from there, and might be able to help
here and there with other CryptoAPI-SF.net things.

As well as the kernel patches, I feel it's worth putting the CryptoAPI's
util-linux patches on the site, but am not sure whether both the 2.11i
and 2.11n one's should be there, or just the 2.11n ones.  From memory,
I've been using the 2.11i ones and haven't really looked at the 2.11n
ones.  Would like people's opinions on this, etc.

It should make for a good next step, and we can see if this helps expand
the userbase of people using crypto stuff with Linux (appropriately),
and also find out if this makes it easier for the people already using
cryptoAPI to keep up to date.

:-)

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift

-- 
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
   - Indira Gandhi