[CryptoAPI-devel] kernel versions

[David B. <db...@du...>]

So do we want to stick to stablizing the 2.4.17 branch ? or is the
thought that we move with kernel releases ? I'm decompressing 2.4.17
currently on my new box(hurray!) which i will use for cryptoAPI devel
and i'm about to pull CVS so hopefully I can get up to speed with the
both of you soon.
Dave

On Mon, 2002-02-25 at 19:50, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 10:54:19AM +0100, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote:
> > well... the cryptoapi in it's current form should be version
> > independent! :-)
> >=20
> Indeed, if this can be accomplished, it is indeed good.
>=20
> > actually there's no sense for the tarball distro to carry a kernel
> > version number... only for the kernel patch distro...
> >=20
> > the only annoying stuff that changes a bit is the top-level Makefile,
> > and some other minor bits in the build framework...
> >
> This will all stabilize... eventually, I guess it isn't really an issue
> with judicious shell scripting.
>=20
> > btw, so far the USAGI and a NFSv4 project is already using the
> > cryptoapi;
> > the frees/wan people are thinking about using it, but are a bit
> > disappointed about the current status...
> > =20
> FreeS/WAN also seems to be in the middle of a complete re-design, so
> compounding their troubles might not go over well :>
>=20
> regards,
> 	kyle
> --=20
> copyleft (c) 2002, Kyle McMartin
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> CryptoAPI-devel mailing list
> Cry...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cryptoapi-devel