Re: [CryptoAPI-devel] testing...

[Kyle M. <ky...@de...>]

On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 10:54:19AM +0100, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote:
> well... the cryptoapi in it's current form should be version
> independent! :-)
> 
Indeed, if this can be accomplished, it is indeed good.

> actually there's no sense for the tarball distro to carry a kernel
> version number... only for the kernel patch distro...
> 
> the only annoying stuff that changes a bit is the top-level Makefile,
> and some other minor bits in the build framework...
>
This will all stabilize... eventually, I guess it isn't really an issue
with judicious shell scripting.

> btw, so far the USAGI and a NFSv4 project is already using the
> cryptoapi;
> the frees/wan people are thinking about using it, but are a bit
> disappointed about the current status...
>  
FreeS/WAN also seems to be in the middle of a complete re-design, so
compounding their troubles might not go over well :>

regards,
	kyle
-- 
copyleft (c) 2002, Kyle McMartin