This has recently become important to fix, because we are trying to analyze some data that is ~50% derived from peaks other than the monoisotopic one. Sean, do you have a sense for how easily your logic/code from sfx would generalize to tide-search? It would be great if we could get this fix made.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
In my code, I generate candidates for each window and merge them into one list prior to the scoring. Since tide is sorting the spectra by precursor and using the active peptide queue, I think you would probably have to search each window as it comes up in the active peptide queue and then merge the results to get the top 5 after you have queried all of the windows for a particular scan.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
FWIW, I've implemented "isotope-windows" in sfx that has similar
functionality.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 5:00 PM, William S Noble wsnoble@users.sf.net
wrote:
Related
Issues: #348
This has recently become important to fix, because we are trying to analyze some data that is ~50% derived from peaks other than the monoisotopic one. Sean, do you have a sense for how easily your logic/code from sfx would generalize to tide-search? It would be great if we could get this fix made.
In my code, I generate candidates for each window and merge them into one list prior to the scoring. Since tide is sorting the spectra by precursor and using the active peptide queue, I think you would probably have to search each window as it comes up in the active peptide queue and then merge the results to get the top 5 after you have queried all of the windows for a particular scan.