#217 jewel anhancement

Arches (45)


Enhancement 1 for jewels:
(new arches) with already existing facesets (e.g. rockcrystals similar to diamonds), values between existing types.
Similar to diamonds:
similar to rubies:
similar to sapphires:
similar to emeralds:
similar to amethyst:

These make getting the original jewels somewhat more difficult.
Removed the identified flag.

(new artifacts): cursed worthless jewels "of Strass", "of Talmi" and "of Tinnef". Needed for some jewelery :)
Facesets identical to "pretty crystal"

(new formulae): creating expensive jewels by jeweler-skill only for high experienced players.

(treasures enhanced): in order to get these jewels in dungeons and on monsters.

(new entries for arch directory):
new jewels are not only in archetypes, but also in the arch directory. Sorry for this inconvenience.


  • Nobody/Anonymous


  • Nobody/Anonymous

    Logged In: NO

    This stuff is allready in crossfire-extended and has been for a year.

  • Nicolas Weeger

    Nicolas Weeger - 2008-05-05

    Logged In: YES
    Originator: NO

    Thanks for the patch :)

    Some nitpicking for future patches :)
    - you're using 'old' versions of the Crossfire files, beware incompatibilities. I suggest you use more recent versions :)
    - instead of giving the whole artifacts / formulae files, could you give a 'diff' of the files? If you're using sources from SVN, simply do 'svn diff artifacts > patch.artifact' to generate a diff file (repeat for other files)
    - for treasures, same as a artifacts / formulae, give diff files if you can. Also, if you're creating a new treasure list, put it in a '.trs' file with the corresponding .arc, in the 'arch' directory
    - since you provide the individual .arc files, you don't need to give the archetypes file

    I didn't yet commit your patch, having issues figuring the exact changes to the treasure lists, but I'll try to find time in the next days for that.

  • Nobody/Anonymous

    Logged In: NO

    Anon: The cf-extended stuff is diffrent gems except for 2, it's a coincidence.

  • Anonymous - 2008-06-10

    Logged In: YES
    Originator: NO

    These all need to be spellchecked, there are alot of spelling errors. Also their values are too high in my opinion for semi-precious stones.

  • Rick Tanner

    Rick Tanner - 2017-01-26
    • status: open --> closed
    • Group: -->
  • Rick Tanner

    Rick Tanner - 2017-01-26

    Patch and data format is cause for concern, balance issues with the proposed content and cosmetic issues with the content are the reasons to deny the proposed patch.

    Closing the ticket.


Log in to post a comment.

Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News.

Sign up for the SourceForge newsletter:

JavaScript is required for this form.

No, thanks