[Cronometer-development] Fw: Biomarkers thoughts
Brought to you by:
artichikin
From: Gerald T. <ge...@sa...> - 2007-01-07 18:55:06
|
Forwarding this to the list partly to try out the list and partly to put it somewhere less ephemeral than email. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gerald Turnquist" <ge...@sa...> To: "Aaron Davidson" <aa...@sp...> Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 8:22 PM Subject: Re: Biomarkers thoughts > Ok, I think I'm tuning in to the pattern you're going for. I'll paraphrase > to see if I've got it. > - The right hand pane is about one day. > - The diet page has two parts; the list of food servings consumed and the > nutrition analysis at the bottom - all for that one day selected at the > top. > - The biomarkers page is a dilemma. The data entry would be for one day > and fits the pattern (multiple entries for some biomarkers, maybe a list > similar to the foods on the diet page?). A chart at the bottom showing > intra-day measurements would fit the pattern. An inter-day chart spanning > multiple days would not. > - The exercise page seems like it would present the same issues. Data > entry for one day, probably allow for multiple entries for the day, desire > to see a chart/report for one day, desire to see a chart/report spanning > multiple days. > - The Nutrition Report off the Reports menu seems like the same thing > again. That is, it is a view of data across multiple days, this time for > food (maybe with the idea of printing or exporting some time?) Right now > it is shown as a table but no reason why it wouldn't benefit from some > graph or chart view too. It even has the from/to dates I wanted for the > biomarker charts. > > Seems like we have the same problem in three different disguises. Good > news about that is that if we come up with a good solution it might apply > across the board. Maybe any intra-day reporting goes on the tab but all > inter-day reports are off the Reports menu. I did love my little Weight > chart but I confess it was largely because it looked purty, but it doesn't > scale up to a whole biomarkers subsystem. > > Interestingly, the left hand with the food search, select, create etc. > only has a connection with the diet page, not with biomarkers or exercise. > Radical thought... should the whole UI become 3 pages that fill the > window - Nutrition (Diet), Biomarkers, and Exercise? The left hand side of > the Biomarkers and Exercise pages become like the food search, select, > create, etc. only for their respective things? Hmm... sounds pretty wild, > but makes me think. And I was just going to do a little biomarker > renovation. Maybe time to rein in the perfectionist tendencies and do the > absolute minimum now to improve it while these more grandiose thoughts > gestate. (To be perfectly honest, as a user I could live without any > biomarkers or exercise capability at all as long as the nutrition part was > excellent and easy to use) > > > As for the database, I was following a similar path with my system, > including using it to try out technologies. I did have an HSQL database > (DB2 first until I thought I might share the program). The searches were > surprisingly fast (not quite as fast as COM) but the program took about 30 > seconds to load because I was loading the whole nutrients part of the > database. I wouldn't do that again for the static data, I prefer the zip > files. I'm perfectly happy to shelve the database idea indefinitely and > only reconsider it for user data, and then only if the current scheme > seems like it can't be shored up to handle a few years of user data. > > Gerald |