You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: <ben...@id...> - 2004-05-22 12:04:25
|
Dear Open Source developer I am doing a research project on "Fun and Software Development" in which I kindly invite you to participate. You will find the online survey under http://fasd.ethz.ch/qsf/. The questionnaire consists of 53 questions and you will need about 15 minutes to complete it. With the FASD project (Fun and Software Development) we want to define the motivational significance of fun when software developers decide to engage in Open Source projects. What is special about our research project is that a similar survey is planned with software developers in commercial firms. This procedure allows the immediate comparison between the involved individuals and the conditions of production of these two development models. Thus we hope to obtain substantial new insights to the phenomenon of Open Source Development. With many thanks for your participation, Benno Luthiger PS: The results of the survey will be published under http://www.isu.unizh.ch/fuehrung/blprojects/FASD/. We have set up the mailing list fa...@we... for this study. Please see http://fasd.ethz.ch/qsf/mailinglist_en.html for registration to this mailing list. _______________________________________________________________________ Benno Luthiger Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich 8092 Zurich Mail: benno.luthiger(at)id.ethz.ch _______________________________________________________________________ |
From: <fu...@ma...> - 2003-02-09 15:40:44
|
> > Hello John, > > The project has for sure good potential, as it is written for OS X > only and use its nice new technology. The project source is always > available via CVS, but is semi-usable yet, and only a few modules are > available. Documentation will come (we'll inform this mailing list), > none is available yet. The core of the bot is still being written, > once finished, modules will have a great potential. > > John, so-bot is not that bad, several users are glad to use it, and I > wrote it :D I fully understand although, it's just not very well > adapted to OS X (was for 68k/classic first), nor it is modular, and > Craw won't have the same goal and public. > > Suggestions and ideas welcome. ;) > > My only issues with So-Bot was the documentation. It took my channel about 6 hours of playing around finally work out the commands (we still can't get chanpro to work! :) ). That and it was slightly unstable under jaguar but it could be as much to do with my installation as anything. If someone could write a dictionary of the syntax required for every command in the same way that So-Bot tells you when you use say a /moduser then it would definitely have rated higher in my esteem eg: So-Bot: Incorrect usage: /moduser <channel> <username> etc Those were always helpful prods in the right direction which made using So-Bot the best Bot experience on OS X but I just think it could be so much more. Any help with documentation for craw, I'd be happy to provide :) If my perl is a bit crap (and trust me it is) I can at least lend a hand in the User experience category (my friends think I put a bit too much emphasis upon the UI because of my 1/2 page rant on the many many reasons why MSN for OSX is the worst designed application in the brief history of Aqua). As I type this my friends and I are still endeavoring to get So-Bot to be the bot we want it to be and until there's a higher level of functionality in Craw (and I download the 10.2 dev kit) its still our bot of choice :) Sorry for calling it crap but it was most probably caused by 2 hours of staring at the help files included hehe. BTW: How do you get chanpro to work? What's the syntax? Thanks a lot!! I think I'll download the source now in fact! John Swaine |
From: T. <mb...@bu...> - 2003-02-07 21:56:18
|
Hello John, The project has for sure good potential, as it is written for OS X only and use its nice new technology. The project source is always available via CVS, but is semi-usable yet, and only a few modules are available. Documentation will come (we'll inform this mailing list), none is available yet. The core of the bot is still being written, once finished, modules will have a great potential. John, so-bot is not that bad, several users are glad to use it, and I wrote it :D I fully understand although, it's just not very well adapted to OS X (was for 68k/classic first), nor it is modular, and Craw won't have the same goal and public. Suggestions and ideas welcome. ;) > Hi > > I'm really interested in this project. Sounds like it has good > potential. At the moment the only choices are a messy Eggdrop install > and so-bot (which is crap). I hope you guys manage to get this software > written!! > > Best of luck > > John Swaine > > PS: Any beta testing - I'm willing :) -- Stephane Thiell http://www.emi.u-bordeaux.fr/~thiell |
From: <fu...@ma...> - 2003-02-06 00:32:24
|
Hi I'm really interested in this project. Sounds like it has good potential. At the moment the only choices are a messy Eggdrop install and so-bot (which is crap). I hope you guys manage to get this software written!! Best of luck John Swaine PS: Any beta testing - I'm willing :) |