From: Caspar Z. <cz...@re...> - 2010-12-28 02:57:26
|
On 12/28/2010 10:50 AM, his...@hi... wrote: > Casper, > > Sorry for getting back to you. > > Basically, I agree on your proposal. > > Why this kind of complex structure happend is that > we have not discussed on the structure of directory among us when we started this > project. So that China, Korea, Japan engineers had developed under their > own idea. > > I had tried to re-structure directories, but not had enough time. > But I would like to do with you. > I've made a fix for this, on my own branch in git.sf repo: http://crackerjack.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=crackerjack/crackerjack;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/caspar I've tested it in RHEL6-i386 GA and seemed everything works OK. Welcome to download the snapshot tar ball to test and give feedbacks: http://crackerjack.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=crackerjack/crackerjack;a=snapshot;h=08bf4ccd0fb570ea09b03f2dbd91a44b6fde33dc;sf=tgz Thanks, Caspar -- Quality Assurance Associate (Kernel) in Red Hat Software (Beijing) Co., R&D Branch TEL: +86-10-62608150 WEB: http://www.redhat.com/ -- C-A-S-P-A-R, Caspar /kæspɑ:/ ;-) |