From: Masatake Y. <ya...@re...> - 2008-06-16 10:12:04
|
> Oh Yes. You are correct. I did not look in to that aspect at all. I just did > a comparison of whatever we have at *testcases/kernel/syscalls* and what > they have in *Crackerjack*. I am listing down my comments here: O.k. I'll focus on *testcases/kernel/syscalls*. So the porting task becomes much simpler. > 91) lstat64 > Comments: We have lstat at *testcases/kernel/syscalls/lstat**. *You may need > to include/port lstat64 on similar lines to sendfile64 and fadvise64. > > 92) setfsuid16 > Comments: We have setfsuid at *testcases/kernel/syscalls/setfsuid**. *You > may need to include/port setfsuid16 on similar lines to sendfile64 and > fadvise64. Really grate list. BTW, > 92) setfsuid16 > Comments: We have setfsuid at *testcases/kernel/syscalls/setfsuid**. *You > may need to include/port setfsuid16 on similar lines to sendfile64 and > fadvise64. You wrote "sendfile64 and fadvise64". I think you mean setfsuid instead, don't you? I coundn't understand why you wrote "sendfile64 and fadvise64" here. Masatake |