From: Masatake Y. <ya...@re...> - 2008-11-19 13:28:14
|
Hi, A LTP developer has interested in porting the test cases of rt_sig* system calls in Crackerjack to LTP. However, no license notice is in sourec files. The author of test cases, could you put the license notice on the sourec files? The test cases may be written by China team. The test cases written by Korean tem can be used under GPL version 2. (http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=002801c91a1c%24211af0f0%246350d2d0%24%40com&forum_name=crackerjack-devel) This is really good. However, in the mail: > We will insert the copyright line into the existing testcase source code. The lines have not been inserted yet(See cs_access.c, a test case of access(2)). I know the reason; Korean developers may not have an account for writing access to Crackerjack CVS repository. I hope the maintainer of this project issue the account to the developers. Anyway, LTP developer can use them because in the mail archive, the license was declared. Subrata, about test cases writing by Korean team, is my understanding correct? The test cases written by Japan team. Good. As far as I read the soruce files, the license notices are in all source files. LTP developer can use them. Masatake YAMATO |
From: Subrata M. <su...@li...> - 2008-11-20 08:28:59
|
Hi Yamato, On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 22:22 +0900, Masatake YAMATO wrote: > Hi, > > A LTP developer has interested in porting the test cases of rt_sig* > system calls in Crackerjack to LTP. However, no license notice is > in sourec files. The author of test cases, could you put the > license notice on the sourec files? > > The test cases may be written by China team. > > > The test cases written by Korean tem can be used under GPL version 2. > (http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=002801c91a1c%24211af0f0%246350d2d0%24%40com&forum_name=crackerjack-devel) > > This is really good. > > However, in the mail: > > > We will insert the copyright line into the existing testcase source code. > > The lines have not been inserted yet(See cs_access.c, a test case of > access(2)). I know the reason; Korean developers may not have an > account for writing access to Crackerjack CVS repository. I hope the > maintainer of this project issue the account to the developers. > > > Anyway, LTP developer can use them because in the mail archive, the > license was declared. > Subrata, about test cases writing by Korean team, is my understanding > correct? > If there is any code open for the community and does not contain the GPL declaration, then there is a possibility by which the code can be made part of other project(s) like LTP. Instead of including the GPL (or later) definition in each and every source code of those test code, the following approach will be far more efficient: The Author of those test cases, or, whoever having Copyright to those code, can reply to this mail (To: ltp...@li...) with the following statement that: 1) The Authors of the Source Code (who has contributed or has Copyright/copyright) available for download, at the following location: https://sourceforge.net/projects/crackerjack https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=177476 has no problem in allowing this code to be re-used under GPL (or later versions) by any party. And hence a DCO Sign-off from them like: 2) Signed-Off-By: XYZ <xy...@12...>, in similar lines we send patches to the mailing lists. A reply to this mail from any of them will be sufficient to use those code. Regards-- Subrata > The test cases written by Japan team. Good. As far as I read the > soruce files, the license notices are in all source files. LTP > developer can use them. > > > Masatake YAMATO |
From: Masatake Y. <ya...@re...> - 2008-11-21 08:30:09
|
> If there is any code open for the community and does not contain the GPL > declaration, then there is a possibility by which the code can be made > part of other project(s) like LTP. Instead of including the GPL (or > later) definition in each and every source code of those test code, the > following approach will be far more efficient: > > The Author of those test cases, or, whoever having Copyright to those > code, can reply to this mail (To: ltp...@li...) with > the following statement that: Even the author name is not written in the source files. I can find the name of the author of Makefile: # # Crackerjack Project # # Copyright (C) 2007 BSTQC. All Rights Reserved. # # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it # under the terms of version 2 of the GNU General Public License as # published by the Free Software Foundation. # # This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful, but # WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of # MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. # # Further, this software is distributed without any warranty that it is # free of the rightful claim of any third person regarding infringement # or the like. Any license provided herein, whether implied or # otherwise, applies only to this software file. Patent licenses, if # any, provided herein do not apply to combinations of this program with # other software, or any other product whatsoever. # # You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along # with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 59 # Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston MA 02111-1307, USA. # # Created by : KONGHAO 2007.06 # However, no mail address to contact with. I'm not sure s/he is on crackerjack-devel list. Masatake YAMATO |
From: Subrata M. <su...@li...> - 2008-11-25 14:12:00
|
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 17:29 +0900, Masatake YAMATO wrote: > > If there is any code open for the community and does not contain the GPL > > declaration, then there is a possibility by which the code can be made > > part of other project(s) like LTP. Instead of including the GPL (or > > later) definition in each and every source code of those test code, the > > following approach will be far more efficient: > > > > The Author of those test cases, or, whoever having Copyright to those > > code, can reply to this mail (To: ltp...@li...) with > > the following statement that: > > Even the author name is not written in the source files. > I can find the name of the author of Makefile: > > # > # Crackerjack Project > # > # Copyright (C) 2007 BSTQC. All Rights Reserved. > # > # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it > # under the terms of version 2 of the GNU General Public License as > # published by the Free Software Foundation. > # > # This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful, but > # WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > # MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. > # > # Further, this software is distributed without any warranty that it is > # free of the rightful claim of any third person regarding infringement > # or the like. Any license provided herein, whether implied or > # otherwise, applies only to this software file. Patent licenses, if > # any, provided herein do not apply to combinations of this program with > # other software, or any other product whatsoever. > # > # You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along > # with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 59 > # Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston MA 02111-1307, USA. > # > # Created by : KONGHAO 2007.06 > # > You can retain this whole information of Copyrights, GPL definition as well as the Created by: Stuff in the Makefile(s) in the ported Sources. Regards-- Subrata > > However, no mail address to contact with. > I'm not sure s/he is on crackerjack-devel list. > > Masatake YAMATO |
From: konghao <ko...@bs...> - 2008-11-26 02:24:46
|
Sorry for check this so late, my office mailbox was offen jamed by too much mails Mr. Hu Changjun of CSIP meet me casually and told me about this matter. Yes, we (BSTQC) agree with using GPL in all of our testcases source file and I will add license code to them. Some of the testcases were written by persons of CSIP and CS2C , I think they all agree with using GPL license because we have discussed about it . If you need a official statement by email, maybe you can mail wa...@cs... (CSIP) she...@cs... jin...@cs... (CS2C) -----原始邮件----- 发件人: Subrata Modak [mailto:su...@li...] 发送时间: 2008年11月25日 22:11 收件人: Masatake YAMATO 抄送: cra...@li...; ko...@bs...; zh...@cs...; wa...@cs...; ltp...@li...; nar...@gm... 主题: Re: the license of test cases of rt_sig* system calls On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 17:29 +0900, Masatake YAMATO wrote: > > If there is any code open for the community and does not contain the GPL > > declaration, then there is a possibility by which the code can be made > > part of other project(s) like LTP. Instead of including the GPL (or > > later) definition in each and every source code of those test code, the > > following approach will be far more efficient: > > > > The Author of those test cases, or, whoever having Copyright to those > > code, can reply to this mail (To: ltp...@li...) with > > the following statement that: > > Even the author name is not written in the source files. > I can find the name of the author of Makefile: > > # > # Crackerjack Project > # > # Copyright (C) 2007 BSTQC. All Rights Reserved. > # > # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it > # under the terms of version 2 of the GNU General Public License as > # published by the Free Software Foundation. > # > # This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful, but > # WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > # MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. > # > # Further, this software is distributed without any warranty that it is > # free of the rightful claim of any third person regarding infringement > # or the like. Any license provided herein, whether implied or > # otherwise, applies only to this software file. Patent licenses, if > # any, provided herein do not apply to combinations of this program with > # other software, or any other product whatsoever. > # > # You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along > # with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 59 > # Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston MA 02111-1307, USA. > # > # Created by : KONGHAO 2007.06 > # > You can retain this whole information of Copyrights, GPL definition as well as the Created by: Stuff in the Makefile(s) in the ported Sources. Regards-- Subrata > > However, no mail address to contact with. > I'm not sure s/he is on crackerjack-devel list. > > Masatake YAMATO |
From: Masatake Y. <ya...@re...> - 2008-11-26 02:31:55
|
> Sorry for check this so late, my office mailbox was offen jamed by > too much mails Mr. Hu Changjun of CSIP meet me casually and told me > about this matter. Yes, we (BSTQC) agree with using GPL in all of > our testcases source file and I will add license code to them. Thank you for response. Do you know how to add license code to the source files? At least the write-access to cvs repository is needed. Do you have it? Masatake YAMATO |
From: Subrata M. <su...@li...> - 2008-11-27 15:43:46
|
On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 09:52 +0800, konghao wrote: > Sorry for check this so late, my office mailbox was offen jamed by too much mails Mr. Hu Changjun of CSIP meet me casually and told me about this matter. > > Yes, we (BSTQC) agree with using GPL in all of our testcases source file and I will add license code to them. > > Some of the testcases were written by persons of CSIP and CS2C , I think they all agree with using GPL license because we have discussed about it . > > If you need a official statement by email, maybe you can mail wa...@cs... (CSIP) she...@cs... jin...@cs... (CS2C) A mail of any sort will do. Regards-- Subrata > > -----原始邮件----- > 发件人: Subrata Modak [mailto:su...@li...] > 发送时间: 2008年11月25日 22:11 > 收件人: Masatake YAMATO > 抄送: cra...@li...; ko...@bs...; > zh...@cs...; wa...@cs...; ltp...@li...; > nar...@gm... > 主题: Re: the license of test cases of rt_sig* system calls > > > > On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 17:29 +0900, Masatake YAMATO wrote: > > > If there is any code open for the community and does not contain the GPL > > > declaration, then there is a possibility by which the code can be made > > > part of other project(s) like LTP. Instead of including the GPL (or > > > later) definition in each and every source code of those test code, the > > > following approach will be far more efficient: > > > > > > The Author of those test cases, or, whoever having Copyright to those > > > code, can reply to this mail (To: ltp...@li...) with > > > the following statement that: > > > > Even the author name is not written in the source files. > > I can find the name of the author of Makefile: > > > > # > > # Crackerjack Project > > # > > # Copyright (C) 2007 BSTQC. All Rights Reserved. > > # > > # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it > > # under the terms of version 2 of the GNU General Public License as > > # published by the Free Software Foundation. > > # > > # This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful, but > > # WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > > # MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. > > # > > # Further, this software is distributed without any warranty that it is > > # free of the rightful claim of any third person regarding infringement > > # or the like. Any license provided herein, whether implied or > > # otherwise, applies only to this software file. Patent licenses, if > > # any, provided herein do not apply to combinations of this program with > > # other software, or any other product whatsoever. > > # > > # You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along > > # with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 59 > > # Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston MA 02111-1307, USA. > > # > > # Created by : KONGHAO 2007.06 > > # > > > > You can retain this whole information of Copyrights, GPL definition as > well as the Created by: Stuff in the Makefile(s) in the ported Sources. > > Regards-- > Subrata > > > > > However, no mail address to contact with. > > I'm not sure s/he is on crackerjack-devel list. > > > > Masatake YAMATO > |
From: Masatake Y. <ya...@re...> - 2008-12-25 10:47:04
|
From: Subrata Modak <su...@li...> Subject: Re: 答复: the license of test cases of rt_sig* system calls Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 21:13:10 +0530 > On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 09:52 +0800, konghao wrote: > > Sorry for check this so late, my office mailbox was offen jamed by too much mails Mr. Hu Changjun of CSIP meet me casually and told me about this matter. > > > > Yes, we (BSTQC) agree with using GPL in all of our testcases source file and I will add license code to them. > > > > Some of the testcases were written by persons of CSIP and CS2C , I think they all agree with using GPL license because we have discussed about it . > > > > If you need a official statement by email, maybe you can mail wa...@cs... (CSIP) she...@cs... jin...@cs... (CS2C) > > A mail of any sort will do. > > Regards-- > Subrata Subrata, did you receive the mail? As far as source code in subversion repository, nothing is changed. Masatake YAMATO |
From: Subrata M. <su...@li...> - 2008-12-29 12:38:15
|
Hi Yamato, On Thu, 2008-12-25 at 19:46 +0900, Masatake YAMATO wrote: > From: Subrata Modak <su...@li...> > Subject: Re: 答复: the license of test cases of rt_sig* system calls > Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 21:13:10 +0530 > > > On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 09:52 +0800, konghao wrote: > > > Sorry for check this so late, my office mailbox was offen jamed by too much mails Mr. Hu Changjun of CSIP meet me casually and told me about this matter. > > > > > > Yes, we (BSTQC) agree with using GPL in all of our testcases source file and I will add license code to them. > > > > > > Some of the testcases were written by persons of CSIP and CS2C , I think they all agree with using GPL license because we have discussed about it . > > > > > > If you need a official statement by email, maybe you can mail wa...@cs... (CSIP) she...@cs... jin...@cs... (CS2C) > > > > A mail of any sort will do. > > > > Regards-- > > Subrata > > Subrata, did you receive the mail? > > As far as source code in subversion repository, > nothing is changed. I have not heard anything from them till now. Regards-- Subrata > > Masatake YAMATO |