|
From: Bas V. <ba...@od...> - 2011-05-24 09:58:34
|
Yow, Interesting. I fixed this, although I don't think there is a guarantee that a - a == 0.0 in C++. I wouldn't use 0.0 thresholds... Bas On 24-May-2011, at 5:11 PM, SourceForge.net wrote: > Bugs item #3306806, was opened at 2011-05-24 09:11 > Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by nobody > You can respond by visiting: > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=968518&aid=3306806&group_id=199196 > > Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, > including the initial issue submission, for this request, > not just the latest update. > Category: None > Group: None > Status: Open > Resolution: None > Priority: 5 > Private: No > Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) > Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) > Summary: doubles_equal(x,x,0) should return TRUE > > Initial Comment: > DOUBLES_EQUAL(x, x, 0.0) yields a test failure. > Intuitively, one would assume that two equal numbers are always considered equal. > Thus, the function doubles_equal() in Utest.cpp should compare with '<=' instead of '<': > return PlatformSpecificFabs(d1 - d2) <= threshold; > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > You can respond by visiting: > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=968518&aid=3306806&group_id=199196 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security. > With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery, > you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection. > Download your free trial now. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1 > _______________________________________________ > Cpputest-developers mailing list > Cpp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cpputest-developers |
