RE: [Cppunit-devel] CppUnit 1.9.6 tar ball -- Visual .NET

[Philippe L. <phi...@ca...>]

It seems that the .h that came with 1.9.2 had an issue with stdafx.h.

I did more tests this morning with the cvs version, and everything is =
fine. I can put the stdafx.h before or after the include and everything =
works as it's suppose to.

Sorry if I gave you a scare :)

Phil

PS Maybe all the .h could have a version label in them so that I could =
see really easyilly that I'm looking at the wrong .h :)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Baptiste Lepilleur [mailto:gai...@fr...]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 5:38 AM
> To: cpp...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Cppunit-devel] CppUnit 1.9.6 tar ball -- Visual .NET
>=20
>=20
> Could you still specify the trouble you add with stdafx.h.
>=20
> Thanks,
> Baptiste.
>=20
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Philippe Lavoie" <phi...@ca...>
> To: "Philippe Lavoie" <phi...@ca...>; "Baptiste=20
> Lepilleur"
> <gai...@fr...>; <cpp...@li...>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 12:54 AM
> Subject: RE: [Cppunit-devel] CppUnit 1.9.6 tar ball -- Visual .NET
>=20
>=20
> Never mind... I had a bad version of the Include files...
>=20
> Sigh... spent the whole afternoon on this... Stupid copy=20
> doesn't work when
> the file is in use... Stupid stupid stupid.
>=20
>=20