RE: [Cppunit-devel] CppUnit 1.9.6 tar ball - Solaris problem
Brought to you by:
blep
From: Stanley S. <su...@t-...> - 2002-04-22 17:15:27
|
Hmm, let me delete EVERYTHING and start over from loggin in. I'm not = sure why, but I've had some very strange behaviors from CVS before, like = recursive directories with GAIM. We use CVS everyday for our own = projects, and we're spread out over 3 continents without any problems, = but we use it a little differently (such as locking a module, and = "moving" it's access tokens to a local server before doing commits). -----Original Message----- From: Steve M. Robbins [mailto:ste...@vi...] Sent: Mon 22-Apr-02 11:06 To: Stanley Sutton Cc: CppUnit Development Subject: Re: [Cppunit-devel] CppUnit 1.9.6 tar ball - Solaris problem On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 10:36:59AM -0500, Stanley Sutton wrote: >=20 > I'm still having some problmes on Solaris 8, using the Forte 6 = compiler. I > removed all my local files and got a fresh CVS snapshot. Here's there = first > error: >=20 > cd . && autoconf > autoconf: warning: both `configure.ac' and `configure.in' are present. > autoconf: warning: proceeding with `configure.ac'. ??? How did that happen? I just ran "cvs update" and there is only configure.in here. > configure.ac:37: error: do not use LIBOBJS directly, use AC_LIBOBJ > (see section `AC_LIBOBJ vs. LIBOBJS' Neither is there any "LIBOBJ" in my configure.in. =20 Something is fishy. -S --=20 by Rocket to the Moon, by Airplane to the Rocket, by Taxi to the Airport, by Frontdoor to the Taxi, by throwing back the blanket and laying down the legs ... - They Might Be Giants |