RE: [Cppunit-devel] CppUnit 1.8.0 features...

[Baptiste L. <gai...@fr...>]

Quoting "Summerwill, Bob" <BSu...@eu...>:

> 
> Baptiste wrote ...
> 
> >> I'm not saying to change CppUnit as a whole. The only thing I want
> to
> change 
> >> is those part of CppUnit that would impose on the "user" policy:
> 
> Fair enough.  Was this the result of a specific problem or bug report?

  Found that one when I started wrote an assertion_traits the other day. I was 
not happy with the result...

> 
> Sorry if my last e-mail comes across badly.  I think that the work
> that's

  Sorry if it seems so, but my english tend to be a bit "rough".

> been done on CppUnit in the last few months is really positive, and am
> just wary of large-scale changes being made, such as virtuals for
> everything.

  Since I probably missworded something in my previous mails, let's just make 
some things clear:
  - CppUnit has moved toward constness, and will continue to move that way.
  - I intend for change to have has little impact has possible
  - There would be no point making everything virtual in CppUnit...
  - I want CppUnit to impose as little constraint as possible on the user 
design (consteness in the user classes should be a matter of choice for 
example).
  - I intend for change being made to brough new functionality or make CppUnit 
easier to use (I don't like to do thing that have no 'value').

  Hey Steve, Baastian, do you share my view on those points ?

  Pfiuuu, just escaped "Const War, the return" ;-)

  Baptiste.

> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Bob
> 




---
Baptiste Lepilleur <gai...@fr...>
http://gaiacrtn.free.fr/index.html
Language: English, French