Re: [Cppunit-devel] 1.6.0 is released!
Brought to you by:
blep
|
From: Baptiste L. <bl...@cl...> - 2001-09-24 21:36:00
|
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve M. Robbins" <ste...@vi...>
To: "CppUnit Development" <cpp...@li...>
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 6:23 AM
Subject: [Cppunit-devel] 1.6.0 is released!
> I'm happy to report that version 1.6.0 is now available on the
> SourceForge web site.
Great! I integrated it to our project at work, it works fine.
> The only significant change from the last snapshot is a last-minute
> bugfix from Baptiste. (The other changes were to doc files.)
>
> The CVS tree is synched up with the release version, and tagged (tag
> REL_1_6_0). My immediate plans are to wait and see what bug reports
> come in. I am prepared to make a 1.6.1 release as soon as necessary,
> and generally I plan to keep making 1.6.x releases as necessary to fix
> bugs.
Well, there are bugs in cppunittest/TestCallerTest (as well as a few
memory leaks I did not spot last time), is does not check correctly the
expected exception stuff. Should that go in 1.6.1 or 1.8.0 (with the
exception enhancement I proposed in another mail)?
> In the meanwhile, we should kick around ideas for 1.8.0. I generally
> favour the "release early, release often" policy. How about the rest
> of you? If we go that route though, we need to be aggressive in
> limiting what changes will be made for 1.8. Let's hear ideas!
What is your definition of often ? once a month, biweekly, weekly ? As
time go, we should strengthen our test suite. Whenever a bug is found, we
should try to write a test for it. I already did it for the TestCaller
thingy.
Baptiste.
---
Baptiste Lepilleur <gai...@fr...> http://gaiacrtn.free.fr/index.html
Author of The Text Reformatter, a tool for fanfiction readers and writers.
Language: English, French (Well, I'm French).
|