cppunit-devel

[Cppunit-devel] Having a memory leak problem

[Doug S. <do...@hu...>]

Hi, developers!

First of all, cppunit is a wonderful tool.  I very big "thank you" to all 
who have worked to develop it!

I am using CPPUNIT_ASSERT() in a loop that executes 256**3 times.  I am 
seeing a memory leak that happens only when I use CPPUNIT_ASSERT() -- I 
don't see the memory leak when I use the assert() macro from the standard C 
library.  The evaluation of the boolean expressions don't create any 
objects, nor do they allocate any memory.  (At first, I thought that the 
expressions weren't being evaluated with the assert() macro because of 
NDEBUG, so I verified that they were evaulated.)  The memory leak consumes 
a lot of memory because of the number of assertions that are evaluated, 
making the CCPUNIT_ASSERT() macro unusable.

I use Visual C++ 6 and version 1.8.0 of cppunit.  I used the included 
project file to build it (no changes), and I'm using cppunit.lib.  I use 
the TextUi.

I spent some time looking at the cppunit source code, but I couldn't find 
anything that looked like a memory leak.  The assert condition never fails, 
so (I believe that implies) the exception isn't being thrown.

Does anyone have any idea where there might be a memory leak?

I can also try to run the same code on Solaris with Forte C++ and GCC and 
on Linux with GCC.  That could help to verify if this is just a Visual C++ 
problem.


-------------------------------------------
Doug Sauder
Software Architect
Hunny Software, Inc
Email: do...@hu...
Phone: 301-948-6999

Re: [Cppunit-devel] Having a memory leak problem

[Baptiste L. <gai...@fr...>]

Would you mind sending me your test programm (how do you detect the leaks
?). I have a good idea on how to chase it.

Thanks in advance,
Baptiste.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Doug Sauder" <do...@hu...>
To: <cpp...@li...>
Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 9:29 PM
Subject: [Cppunit-devel] Having a memory leak problem


> Hi, developers!
>
> First of all, cppunit is a wonderful tool.  I very big "thank you" to all
> who have worked to develop it!
>
> I am using CPPUNIT_ASSERT() in a loop that executes 256**3 times.  I am
> seeing a memory leak that happens only when I use CPPUNIT_ASSERT() -- I
> don't see the memory leak when I use the assert() macro from the standard
C
> library.  The evaluation of the boolean expressions don't create any
> objects, nor do they allocate any memory.  (At first, I thought that the
> expressions weren't being evaluated with the assert() macro because of
> NDEBUG, so I verified that they were evaulated.)  The memory leak consumes
> a lot of memory because of the number of assertions that are evaluated,
> making the CCPUNIT_ASSERT() macro unusable.
>
> I use Visual C++ 6 and version 1.8.0 of cppunit.  I used the included
> project file to build it (no changes), and I'm using cppunit.lib.  I use
> the TextUi.
>
> I spent some time looking at the cppunit source code, but I couldn't find
> anything that looked like a memory leak.  The assert condition never
fails,
> so (I believe that implies) the exception isn't being thrown.
>
> Does anyone have any idea where there might be a memory leak?
>
> I can also try to run the same code on Solaris with Forte C++ and GCC and
> on Linux with GCC.  That could help to verify if this is just a Visual C++
> problem.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------
> Doug Sauder
> Software Architect
> Hunny Software, Inc
> Email: do...@hu...
> Phone: 301-948-6999
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________
>
> Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
> the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: ban...@so...
> _______________________________________________
> Cppunit-devel mailing list
> Cpp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppunit-devel
>

[Cppunit-devel] XML Log Report

[Luis J. <ljo...@cr...>]

Hello,

Cppunit is a great tool!

The defined Macros help a lot, simplifying the code.

My question is: does anyone has produced a XML output similar to
JUnit's ?

It would be very helpful to use the same XSL.

Waiting for an answer,

thanks in advance,

Luis Joaquim

Re: [Cppunit-devel] XML Log Report

[Baptiste L. <gai...@fr...>]

In the contrib directory you can find some XSL scripts to convert the XML
output to HTML. You can find a few other at:
http://www.trickpalace.net/cppll/cuppa/work/
(thanks to 'cuppa' project team).

What is JUnit format ? Could the conversion be done with a simple XSL script
?

Baptiste.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Luis Joaquim" <ljo...@cr...>
To: <cpp...@li...>
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 5:18 PM
Subject: [Cppunit-devel] XML Log Report


> Hello,
>
> Cppunit is a great tool!
>
> The defined Macros help a lot, simplifying the code.
>
> My question is: does anyone has produced a XML output similar to
> JUnit's ?
>
> It would be very helpful to use the same XSL.
>
> Waiting for an answer,
>
> thanks in advance,
>
> Luis Joaquim
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________
> Hundreds of nodes, one monster rendering program.
> Now that's a super model! Visit http://clustering.foundries.sf.net/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cppunit-devel mailing list
> Cpp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppunit-devel
>

Re[2]: [Cppunit-devel] XML Log Report

[Luis J. <ljo...@cr...>]

Hello,

Thanks for your URL.

"JUnit format" is not a good expression. What I meant is XML format
similiar to JUnit - in order to use the same XSL.

But, let me explain my problem: thoses logs (even the ones in the URL
you sent) don't show the SUITE of the tests! :(

For instance, if I have two classes (suites), each one has two methods (a, b,
c, d), I don't want to simply know: test d failed.
I want to know in which suite the test is.

(you can see this in a JUnit report).

--another question: WHERE is the cppunit 1.9 ?!?

I will wait for you anwser. Thanks again,

Luis Joaquim



Wednesday, May 22, 2002, 6:18:19 PM, you wrote:

BL> In the contrib directory you can find some XSL scripts to convert the XML
BL> output to HTML. You can find a few other at:
BL> http://www.trickpalace.net/cppll/cuppa/work/
BL> (thanks to 'cuppa' project team).

BL> What is JUnit format ? Could the conversion be done with a simple XSL script
BL> ?

BL> Baptiste.

BL> ----- Original Message -----
BL> From: "Luis Joaquim" <ljo...@cr...>
BL> To: <cpp...@li...>
BL> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 5:18 PM
BL> Subject: [Cppunit-devel] XML Log Report


>> Hello,
>>
>> Cppunit is a great tool!
>>
>> The defined Macros help a lot, simplifying the code.
>>
>> My question is: does anyone has produced a XML output similar to
>> JUnit's ?
>>
>> It would be very helpful to use the same XSL.
>>
>> Waiting for an answer,
>>
>> thanks in advance,
>>
>> Luis Joaquim
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________
>> Hundreds of nodes, one monster rendering program.
>> Now that's a super model! Visit http://clustering.foundries.sf.net/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cppunit-devel mailing list
>> Cpp...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppunit-devel
>>



---
Luis Joaquim
Critical Software, S.A.
R. Pedro Nunes, IPN
3030-199 Coimbra - Portugal
Tel: +351.239.700.945 - Fax +351.239.700.905
http://www.criticalsoftware.com
ljo...@cr...

Re: Re[2]: [Cppunit-devel] XML Log Report

[Baptiste L. <gai...@fr...>]

As usal, the snapshop can be found at:

http://cppunit.sourceforge.net/snapshot/
http://cppunit.sourceforge.net/snapshot/cppunit-1.9.6.tar.gz
http://cppunit.sourceforge.net/snapshot/cppunit-docs-1.9.6.tar.gz

See below...

----- Original Message -----
From: "Luis Joaquim" <ljo...@cr...>
To: "Baptiste Lepilleur" <gai...@fr...>
Cc: <cpp...@li...>
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 7:36 PM
Subject: Re[2]: [Cppunit-devel] XML Log Report


> Hello,
>
> Thanks for your URL.
>
> "JUnit format" is not a good expression. What I meant is XML format
> similiar to JUnit - in order to use the same XSL.
>
> But, let me explain my problem: thoses logs (even the ones in the URL
> you sent) don't show the SUITE of the tests! :(
>
> For instance, if I have two classes (suites), each one has two methods (a,
b,
> c, d), I don't want to simply know: test d failed.

How are you creating your test suite? The helper macros include the test
fixture name in the test name (to solve
the problem indicated above).

Baptiste.
---
Baptiste Lepilleur <gai...@fr...>
http://gaiacrtn.free.fr/