I do agree. This is a legacy of the original version of CppUnit, but I doubt
it was ever really used. Can someone provide any good reason why
TestDecorator should not destroy the test that is passed at construction ?
Notes that this also impact TestSetUp and RepeatedTest as they inherits
TestDecorator...
Baptiste.
----- Original Message -----
From: "FUKUDA Fumiki" <ff...@nt...>
To: <cpp...@li...>
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 11:38 AM
Subject: [Cppunit-devel] ~TestDecorator() does NOT delete test
> Hi,
>
> I found a questionable code.
>
> TestDecorator::~TestDecorator() does NOT delete decorated Test*
> I think it will lead memory-leak or memory-run-up...
>
> -----:-----:-----:-----:-----:-----:-----:-----:-----:-----
> FUKUDA (episteme) Fumiki -- magical, but never a magic...
|
