cppunit-devel Mailing List for CppUnit - C++ port of JUnit (Page 17)
Brought to you by:
blep
Menu
▾
▴
cppunit-devel — CppUnit Developer Mailing List
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(21) |
May
(96) |
Jun
(109) |
Jul
(42) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(106) |
Oct
(60) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(6) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(11) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(30) |
Jun
(37) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(33) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(22) |
Nov
(19) |
Dec
(15) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(34) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(11) |
Apr
(12) |
May
(16) |
Jun
(24) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(23) |
Sep
(42) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(32) |
Dec
(33) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(41) |
Feb
(41) |
Mar
(24) |
Apr
(25) |
May
(18) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(22) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(15) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(11) |
Apr
(16) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(17) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(11) |
Nov
(15) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
(7) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(7) |
Dec
|
| 2010 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2012 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Baptiste L. <gai...@fr...> - 2004-03-13 18:00:53
|
Some last things I wanted to put in before 1.10. I've also made a CVS snapshot available for download, so it is now possible to make patch for configure/Imakefile stuff even if you don't have cvs. New in CppUnit 1.9.14: --------------------- * Assertions - Ported exception assertion macros from cppunit 2 to the 1.9.x series: CPPUNIT_ASSERT_THROW, CPPUNIT_ASSERT_NO_THROW, CPPUNIT_ASSERT_ASSERTION_FAIL, CPPUNIT_ASSERT_ASSERTION_PASS. * Deprecated: - The helper macros: CPPUNIT_TEST_FAIL & CPPUNIT_TEST_EXCEPTION have been deprecated. Use the new exception assertion macros instead. * Bug Fix: - cppunit-config: bug #903363, missing -ldl from the output of cppunit-config --libs. Fixed thanks Eric Blossom patch. - test plug-in(unix): Adding RTLD_GLOBAL allows test plug-ins to provide symbols to shared objects they load themselves. Thanks goes to Gareth Sylvester for this patch (#816563). Baptiste. |
|
From: Trudell, W. (DSG) <wtr...@ca...> - 2004-03-10 14:01:35
|
Hi, I downloaded CPPUnit 1.8.0 (and 1.9.0). I unzipped and untarred the file on HP-UX 11.00. It created cppunit-1.8.0 off my home directory. I executed configure from cppunit-1.8.0 which ran successfully. I then executed `make' from cppunit-1.8.0 and I'm getting an error: cppunit-1.8.0>make No suffix list. Making all in src No suffix list. Making all in cppunit source='Asserter.cpp' object='Asserter.lo' libtool=yes \ depfile='.deps/Asserter.Plo' tmpdepfile='.deps/Asserter.TPlo' \ depmode=none /bin/sh ../../config/depcomp \ /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=compile aCC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../config -I../../include -I../../include -g -c -o Asserter.lo `test -f Asserter.cpp || echo './'`Asserter.cpp rm -f .libs/Asserter.lo aCC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../config -I../../include -I../../include -g -c Asserter.cpp +Z -DPIC Error 119: "../../include/cppunit/Portability.h", line 81 # #error Cannot define CppUnit::OStringStream. # error Cannot define CppUnit::OStringStream. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ This implies that CPPUNIT_HAVE_SSTREAM and CPPUNIT_HAVE_CLASS_STRSTREAM are NOT defined. I'm guessing it's a setting in my environment/configuration that is missing. Any clues on how to fix it? Thanks, Bill Trudell Tampa, Fl ************************************************************************** The information transmitted herewith is sensitive information intended only for use by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from your computer. |
|
From: Eric B. <eb...@co...> - 2004-03-09 06:23:38
|
Hi, This patch fixes request 903363, missing -ldl from the output of cppunit-config --libs. Eric |
|
From: <MAI...@ma...> - 2004-03-04 03:31:40
|
Failed to deliver to '<ya...@gs...>' Virus(es) found. information.zip is infected with W32/Netsky.b@MM!zip Viruses: 1 Trojans: 0 Jokes: 0 Tests: 0 Captured by McAfee antivirus plugin running on CommuniGate Pro mail server <http://www.stalker.com/CommuniGatePro/> |
|
From: <shi...@ag...> - 2004-03-02 03:37:13
|
アジレント・テクノロジー(株) 自動計測本部 SOC1グループ 佐藤です。 大変申し訳ございませんが、3月8日まで出張のため不在とさせて頂いております。 戻り次第ご連絡差し上げますのでご了承ください。 Thank you for your message. I am sorry but I am out of office until March 8th. I will reply you as soon as possible after I return. Shin Sato Agilent Technologies Japan, ATG S&S SOC#1 |
|
From: Baptiste L. <gai...@fr...> - 2004-02-20 09:08:39
|
Well, here is the long awaited release.
If no issue arise, this will be the official 1.9.10 stable release. So
please report any remaining issues with this release.
Notes that all development snapshots have been moved from the web page
to sourceforge download page for better visibility and easier access.
The wiki contains quick links:
http://cppunit.sf.net
Baptiste.
New in CppUnit 1.9.12:
---------------------
* Test Plug-in
- added support contributed support for UNIX systems that
have libdld and not libdl (e.g. hp-ux). Contributed by
Abdessattar Sassi.
* RTTI
- TypeInfoHelper now used gcc c++ abi to demangle typeinfo name thanks to
Neil Ferguson contribution.
* Bug Fix:
- MFC TestRunner: integrated bug fix from Tim Threlkeld for bug
#610191 and #610162. Fixed assertion when minizing dialog
(bug #643612).
- XMLOutputter: Fixed bug #676505: no space inserted between attributes
of XmlElement.
- CppUnit portability: fixed many mistakes relating to compilation
without type info or namespace reported by Philip Craig.
- Missing destructor with no throw specification for
DynamicLibraryManagerException. Bug #619059.
- Fixed missing export for operator <<(TextTestResult). Bug #610119.
- Missing include for typeinfo in TestNamer.h. Bug #662666.
* Compilation
- Fixed compilation issues for Borland C++ 6 and STLPort. Bug #694971,
#699794 and #662666.
- Fixed compilation issues for AIX.
- Fixed compilation issues for Visual C++ .NET 2002.
- Fixed doxygen usage in mingw environment (space not allowed in
doxygen path). Bug #700730.
- Fixed compilation issue for mingw (bug #711583).
|
|
From: H. <aq...@bk...> - 2004-02-16 23:30:24
|
|
|
From: <Pos...@ma...> - 2004-02-10 12:27:19
|
The following message contained restricted attachment(s) which have been removed: From : cpp...@li... To : mi...@gi... Subject : hello Message-ID: Attachment(s) removed: ----------------------------------------- document.scr |
|
From: asd e. <h2...@ya...> - 2004-02-09 18:40:08
|
Hi, I am new to automation and wants to test the API's of the existing project ( which is in development). Is it possible to customize CppUnit for that. We were developing our own test harness but the automation specialist has left the job. We have no documentaiton of the test harness he developed and it is very difficult to understand the concept. Any help... Thanks Dave __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html |
|
From: asd e. <h2...@ya...> - 2004-02-09 18:38:02
|
Hi, I am new to automation and wants to test the API's of the existing project ( which is in development). Is it possible to customize CppUnit for that. We were developing our own test harness but the automation specialist has left the job. We have no documentaiton of the test harness he developed and it is very difficult to understand the concept. Any help... Thanks Dave __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html |
|
From: <xml...@xm...> - 2004-02-07 05:28:03
|
Your mail to 'xmlhack' with the subject
[SPAM] ERROR
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The reason it is being held:
Message has a suspicious header
Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive
notification of the moderator's decision. If you would like to cancel
this posting, please visit the following URL:
http://lists.usefulinc.com/mailman/confirm/xmlhack/17b4aeffa0302f474c606ac19676123649e4391c
|
|
From: markd <ma...@bo...> - 2004-02-05 15:11:09
|
Greetings, Apologies in advance if this seems rant-like. I've actually been enjoying CppUnit so far and am looking forward to using it. If you'd like me to make edits / improve the cookbook, I'd be glad to do it. I downloaded CppUnit 1.8.0 and the docs, and had problems working through the Cookbook. As it stands, you can't really work through it like a tutorial, which is how I wanted to use it - to type in the code for each step, get it to run, then move on to the next one. (and it seems to have started out that way, with "ok, now compile and run" here and there) At each step along the way I've got a working test that I can then monkey-see monkey-do when making new tests on my own. A couple of examples: the class being tested starts out as "class Complex". Then, right before "TestFactoryRegistry", it becomes ComplexNumber. New methods on Complex[Number] are used, but not defined. When registering the suite with CPPUNIT_TEST_SUITE_REGISTRATION( ComplexNumber ); I had to use ComplexNumberTest instead to make it work. In TestFactoryRegistry, the two pitfalls the registry was created to solve aren't really elaborated. such as "# compilation bottleneck caused by the inclusion of all test case headers (see previous example)", even though the previous example didn't include anything except the helper macros. Also, none of the examples show which headers to actually include. (granted, the spelunking, g++ -E, and debugging helped me work through all the problems and ended up with a couple different working tests, but I got frustrated and discouraged along the way) Also, the very last item says "To do that, the application must returns a value different than 0 to indicate that there was an error.", although the code included returns 0 to indicate an error and 1 to indicate non-error, which is opposite from the sentence, plus opposite from what unix shells are expecting for a program return value. Thanks for your time. Cheers, ++Mark Dalrymple, ma...@bo... http://borkware.com |
|
From: <Administrator> - 2004-02-04 23:39:59
|
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has blocked an attachment. Sender = cpp...@li... Recipient(s) = Ben Messenger Subject = Status Scanning time = 02/05/2004 10:31:44 Action on file blocking: The attachment xrp.scr matches the file blocking settings. ScanMail has Deleted it. Warning to Sender: Action taken by attachment blocking. |
|
From: <bo...@ar...> - 2004-02-03 09:44:15
|
=== This is an automated response to your message === === Just reply to this message to identify yourself === Your original message is being held until you can be identified as a real person. We receive hundreds of SPAM messages per day and this tool eliminates 100% of them. All you have to do is reply to this message and your original message will be released and your address will be added to the list that can pass unmolested through the server. Unless there is a problem you should only see this message one time. Or if you are connected to the internet just click this link: http://www.crewsoft.com/spamtrap/release.php?CSIkey=AAA0_aioC If you would like more information about what is taking place you can read about it at http://www.crewsoft.com/spamtrap/?page=info.php Sorry for the inconvience, unsolicited bulk email (SPAM) has made life more difficult for all of us. |
|
From: <pos...@di...> - 2004-02-03 02:01:48
|
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
Unable to deliver message to the following recipients, because the message was forwarded more than the maximum allowed times. This could indicate a mail loop.
al...@ds...
|
|
From: viruswall postmaster - 2004-02-03 01:28:59
|
Sender, InterScan has detected virus(es) in your e-mail attachment. Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 18:30:01 -0700 Method: Mail From: <cpp...@li...> To: al...@ds... File: text.pif Action: deleted Virus: WORM_MYDOOM.A |
|
From: <MAI...@we...> - 2004-02-02 09:41:52
|
The original message was received at Mon Feb 2 11:48:18 2004 Likely reason for failure: 550 5.1.1 <je...@wi...>... User unknown _____________________________________________________________ |
|
From: Service de d. du c. <pos...@li...> - 2004-02-01 14:12:51
|
- Ces destinataires ont =E9t=E9 trait=E9s par le serveur de messagerie :
am...@m6...; =C9chec; 5.5.0 (=E9tat du protocole diff=E9rent ou non =
d=E9fini)
ATM =E0 distance mx1.grolier.fr : Diagnostic SMTP : 554 <amatest@m6ne=
t.fr>: Recipient address rejected: Relay access denied
|
|
From: <pos...@Jo...> - 2004-01-31 07:23:57
|
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
Unable to deliver message to the following recipients, because the message was forwarded more than the maximum allowed times. This could indicate a mail loop.
ke...@ph...
|
|
From: <pos...@Jo...> - 2004-01-31 01:42:26
|
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
Unable to deliver message to the following recipients, because the message was forwarded more than the maximum allowed times. This could indicate a mail loop.
ke...@ph...
|
|
From: <pos...@Jo...> - 2004-01-31 01:42:24
|
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
Unable to deliver message to the following recipients, because the message was forwarded more than the maximum allowed times. This could indicate a mail loop.
ke...@ph...
|
|
From: <pos...@Jo...> - 2004-01-29 10:52:09
|
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
Unable to deliver message to the following recipients, because the message was forwarded more than the maximum allowed times. This could indicate a mail loop.
ke...@ph...
|
|
From: <pos...@Jo...> - 2004-01-29 10:52:08
|
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
Unable to deliver message to the following recipients, because the message was forwarded more than the maximum allowed times. This could indicate a mail loop.
ke...@ph...
|
|
From: <pos...@Jo...> - 2004-01-29 10:52:08
|
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
Unable to deliver message to the following recipients, because the message was forwarded more than the maximum allowed times. This could indicate a mail loop.
ke...@ph...
|
|
From: <pos...@Jo...> - 2004-01-29 10:52:07
|
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
Unable to deliver message to the following recipients, because the message was forwarded more than the maximum allowed times. This could indicate a mail loop.
ke...@ph...
|
180 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
