cppunit-devel — CppUnit Developer Mailing List

[Cppunit-devel] XmlOutputter::setStyleSheet not having any effect

[CppUnit d. m. l. <cpp...@li...>]

I'm passing a style sheet to XmlOutputter::setStyleSheet, but it has no
effect on the output.  There are no runtime errors or complaints.  Is
there something else I need to do to activate it?

[Cppunit-devel] TimeOutTestCaller class

[CppUnit d. m. l. <cpp...@li...>]

Hello,
First sorry if my English is bad, i will try to explain my request.
I want to use TimeOutTestCaller<http://www.hikerproject.org/doc/html/class_time_out_test_caller.html>class
in my test frame-work to create TestCase's that run for 10 second for
example. I found a example of usage here :
http://cppunit.sourceforge.net/doc/lastest/group___writing_test_fixture.html#ga5
I have two questions about this class:
1- I have many TestCase that i create with different parameters, i want to
use TimeOutTestCaller with this TestCases, is-it possible?
2- Where can I found TimeOutTestCaller on cppunit?  because in the doxygen
of CppUnit-1.12-0  I don't found documentation about this class . It seems
that this
class doesn't exist in the version of cppunit i have installed on my
computer.

Thank's for the replier.

Otmane

[Cppunit-devel] Building the samples

[CppUnit d. m. l. <cpp...@li...>]

Hello All,

I've built cppunit on Max OS X 10.4.9 and built and use the static
version.  However, I want to use the dynamic libraries with the
DLLPluginTester.  I have followed the build instructions for building a
universal version from the home page and built everything.  However, for
the samples, I get a message on the Terminal that there is nothing to be
done for make all or make install for the plugin samples.

>> Making all in ClockerPlugIn
>> make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
>> Making all in DumperPlugIn
>> make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'.

How do you build the plugin samples?  Any help would be appreciated.

BTW: I have build and run the plugin samples with the plugin tester on
the PC using Dev Studio 2005 and everything works fine there.

Thanks,
-Mike

[Cppunit-devel] Test suites are not registered.

[CppUnit d. m. l. <cpp...@li...>]

hi,

    All the object files are archived using \"ar\"(linux command),and it is used to create a binary.
    On executing the binary, suites are not registered at initialization time.ie without calling CPPUNIT_TEST_SUITE_REGISTRATION the program control enters into the main. So my testcases are not executed. 
    
  But without archiving the object files,when they are used directly  ,the suites are registered and my test cases are executed.
     operating system -fedora core 2
    g++ version-3.3.3.

Thanks,
alamelu.s


   
   
    
    

[Cppunit-devel] How to write to test System Calls

[CppUnit d. m. l. <cpp...@li...>]

Hi all,
This is Sandeep.
I have developed some multi threaded application in which i am using
CreateThread system call.

I need to test this application with CppUnit but i don't know how to make a
test for that System call.

Now Suppose if i replace this system call implementation with my own written
dummy implementation then it might clash with system dlls.

Suppose if i don't replace this system call implementation with my own then
it might be the case that every time it succeeds, then
i can't be able to test my code for false cases also...


Can any body helop me out.

Thanks and Regards
Sandeep

[Cppunit-devel] Please add CppUnit to Coverity Scanner

[CppUnit d. m. l. <cpp...@li...>]

Hello Coverity,

I'm smr99 at sourceforge, one of the developers of CppUnit
(http://sourceforge.net/projects/cppunit).  I'd like to have you add
CppUnit to your bug scanner (http://scan.coverity.com/index.html).

Thanks,
-Steve

Re: [Cppunit-devel] How to Test a Module that is dependent on other module?

[CppUnit d. m. l. <cpp...@li...>]

Hello
Ya i got what you wanna say.
But i have another problem....
Suppose i want to create test cases for system calls. for e.g. a call to
createthread()
or to createevent. how to provide test cases for those calls
Suppose i replace those system calls with dummy functions. that's fine but =
i
think it will clash with system dlls. then how do i tackle this problem.

Thanks.




On 6/4/07, CppUnit development mailing list <
cpp...@li...> wrote:
>
> Hello Sandeep,
>
> Am Montag, 4. Juni 2007 schrieb CppUnit development mailing list:
> > Can Any body tell me how to test any module that is itself dependent on
> > other modules.
> > For example.
> > i have class A having module named aProc().
> > And suppose aProc() makes a call to any module declared in other class,
> > lets say B.
> [...]
> > So here in Class A aProc() is dependent on b.bProc()'s output.
> > So my question is that do i need to make a TestSuits for class B also
> along
> > with class A.
> > Remember i want to unit test only Class A and not B.
>
> What is the reason that you do not want to test class B in your scenario?
> Usually, you should do so also.
>
> But I assume that you are not able to test B for some reason (e.g. due to
> remote implementation or something else). In this case it is common sense
> to
> use a stub or a mock object of class B.
>
> In C++ you can simply exchange the B.cpp implementation file, for example=
,
> and
> provide your own implementation. This could be rather empty and just
> enough
> code that A is working (stub), or it could contain additional test code
> that
> tests for, e.g., known input/output values or a counter of the amount of
> calls to B::bProc(). The latter would be a mock object.
>
> I hope I got the point and this was help for you. :-)
>
> Kind regards,
> Marcel
>
>
> --
> Marcel Winandy
> http://www.prosec.rub.de/staff/winandy.html
> Horst G=F6rtz Institute for IT Security, Ruhr-University Bochum
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> Cppunit-devel mailing list
> Cpp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppunit-devel
>

Re: [Cppunit-devel] How to Test a Module that is dependent on other module?

[CppUnit d. m. l. <cpp...@li...>]

Hello Sandeep,

Am Montag, 4. Juni 2007 schrieb CppUnit development mailing list:
> Can Any body tell me how to test any module that is itself dependent on
> other modules.
> For example.
> i have class A having module named aProc().
> And suppose aProc() makes a call to any module declared in other class,
> lets say B.
[...]
> So here in Class A aProc() is dependent on b.bProc()'s output.
> So my question is that do i need to make a TestSuits for class B also alo=
ng
> with class A.
> Remember i want to unit test only Class A and not B.

What is the reason that you do not want to test class B in your scenario?=20
Usually, you should do so also.

But I assume that you are not able to test B for some reason (e.g. due to=20
remote implementation or something else). In this case it is common sense t=
o=20
use a stub or a mock object of class B.

In C++ you can simply exchange the B.cpp implementation file, for example, =
and=20
provide your own implementation. This could be rather empty and just enough=
=20
code that A is working (stub), or it could contain additional test code tha=
t=20
tests for, e.g., known input/output values or a counter of the amount of=20
calls to B::bProc(). The latter would be a mock object.

I hope I got the point and this was help for you. :-)

Kind regards,
 Marcel


=2D-=20
Marcel Winandy
http://www.prosec.rub.de/staff/winandy.html
Horst G=F6rtz Institute for IT Security, Ruhr-University Bochum

[Cppunit-devel] How to Test a Module that is dependent on other module?

[CppUnit d. m. l. <cpp...@li...>]

Hi All.
Can Any body tell me how to test any module that is itself dependent on
other modules.
For example.
i have class A having module named aProc().
And suppose aProc() makes a call to any module declared in other class, lets
say B.
as
class A
{
//...
bool aProc()
{
B b;
if ( b.bProc()) // Call to B class' function
{
// DO SOMETHING
}
else
{
//DO SOMETHING
}

}

So here in Class A aProc() is dependent on b.bProc()'s output.
So my question is that do i need to make a TestSuits for class B also along
with class A.
Remember i want to unit test only Class A and not B.

Regards,
Sandeep.

[Cppunit-devel] How to Test a multithreaded application

[CppUnit d. m. l. <cpp...@li...>]

Hi all.
I have developed a Server Application that Tests a Client for possible test
scenarios.
It send an asynchrnous replies to client as a response to any command.
Every time it sends an Asynchrnous reply, it creates a thread and make a
remote procedure call to a function. My Question is that how to create a
testCase for that module that is creating a thread and calling a remote
procedure.
Here is the sample code that creates a thread and make a remote procedure
call.
This RPC is based on ONCRPC framework.

BOOL CRadioServerInterface ::
Object_Login__Session_Status(unsigned short uArgs)
{
Session_status=uArgs;
void * ignore = NULL;
HANDLE login__thread;
DWORD ID__loginThread;
login__thread = CreateThread(NULL,
0,
(LPTHREAD_START_ROUTINE) createLoginThread,
ignore,
0,
&ID__loginThread);
if (login__thread == NULL)
return FALSE;
else
return TRUE;
}

// THIS IS THEAD
void CRadioServerInterface :: createLoginThread(void * ignore)
{
if( getInstance()->createClient() ) // CREATE A NEW CLIENT
{
// CALL A REMOTE PROCEDURE
call__session_1(&(getInstance()->Session_status),getInstance()->m_clnt);
clnt_destroy(getInstance()->m_clnt); // DESTROYS A CLIENT HANDLE
}
}


HERE IN Object_Login__Session_Status I AM CREATING A THREAD NAMED
createLoginThread
IN THIS THREAD I AM CREATING
1. A CLIENT HANDLE TO A REMOTE CLIENT
2. MAKING A CALL TO REMOTE PROCEDURE NAMED call__session_1
3. AND DESTROYING A CLIENT HANDLE

So i need to know how to create a TestCase for Object_Login__Session_status
and for createLoginThread
function.
I have searched for it a lot but unable to found any solution for the
problem.

Regards,
Sandeep.

[Cppunit-devel] Testing of parameters in tested function

[CppUnit d. m. l. <cpp...@li...>]

Hi,

            I adopted CppUnit into our big project - it works smoothly,
really thanks. But we have following mental problem: each function
should test its parameters if they are valid (those tests must be
performed inside of that function). We would like to be sure, that
function tests if parameters are valid from CppUnit test cases to be
sure, that some developers did not change those tests. It would be also
good if such a function asserts during standard run (when not run from
test case).

=20

            I added such things into my local copy of CppUnit and it
seems to work OK. Do you thing that anybody else would be interested in
such extension? I am able to contribute it into head branch if answer is
possitive. Or is there other procedure to be followed? I choosed direct
question, because I have functional request and also its solution.

=20

Thank you for answer, Jan Mach.

=20

[Cppunit-devel] setup() function per suite not per test

[CppUnit d. m. l. <cpp...@li...>]

How can I create setup function at the suite level, 
Meaning that it is called at the beginning of the suite run and not for
every test.
Thanks
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/setup%28%29-function-per-suite-not-per-test-tf3668930.html#a10251395
Sent from the cppunit-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

[Cppunit-devel] About the cookbook

[CppUnit d. m. l. <cpp...@li...>]

Greetings,
there is something strange in

  http://cppunit.sourceforge.net/doc/lastest/cppunit_cookbook.html

towards the end ... where it says

With Visual C++, this is done in Project Settings/Post-Build step, by adding 
the following command: <code></code>. 

I guess the command got lost ?

Thank you for your consideration,
Davide Bolcioni
-- 
There is no place like /home.

[Cppunit-devel] CppUnit - Is there a tutorial on reporting?

[CppUnit d. m. l. <cpp...@li...>]
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Re: [Cppunit-devel] Compiling Money Example on Visual Studio 2005

[CppUnit d. m. l. <cpp...@li...>]

> error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol "__declspec(dllimport) public: 
> char const * __thiscall type_info::name(void)const " 

I can compile the Money example with Visual C++ 2005 Professional SP1 
without any problems.

Note : I don't use the English version of Visual Studio, so the labels I 
use here may not be fully the same as yours.

I use the following procedure :
1) Unpack cppunit-1.11.0.tar.gz
3) Open examples\examples.dsw and convert all projects
4) Right click on the "money" project and select "Define as startup project"
5) Right click on the "money" project and select "Properties". Go to 
"Configuration properties" > "Linker" > "Input". In the list "Additional 
dependencies" remove "cppunitd.lib" then click "OK".
6) Click on the menu "Build" > "Build money". There are some warnings 
about sprintf. After the build, the tests are run : OK (4)


The errors you get seems to be due to inconsistent compiler options 
between the static library "cppunit" and the "money" example. Especially 
the option /GR for enabling RTTI (Runtime Type Information). The option 
can be found in the Project Properties dialog box : "Configuration 
properties" > "C/C++" > "Language" > "Enable type information"


Another point to be checked : before trying to compile with VS2005, did 
you try to compile with VS2003 or another older compiler ? If you did, 
make sure to "clean" your project, by deleting all directories named 
"Debug" or "Release" before trying to compile again.

Good luck.

Vincent Rivière
vri...@us...

[Cppunit-devel] Can Cppunit work with Visual Studio 2005?

[CppUnit d. m. l. <cpp...@li...>]

I tried recompiling our software containing Cppunit with Visual Studio
2005 and have very similar errors reported by Srivalli last month
(3/6/07) "Compiling Money Example on Visual Studio 2005" but
unfortunately, I don't see a helpful answer yet.

We have been using Cppunit 10.0.2 (from June 18, 2004) and Microsoft
Visual Studio .NET 2003.

I see the latest Cppunit version is 1.12.0 which was released June 30,
2006.

Can Cppunit 10.0.2 work with VS 2005?  Can Cppunit 1.12.0 work with VS
2005?  How do you resolve the following unresolved external symbols
reported by Srivali?

----------------------------------------------------
When I compile Money Example of CPPUnit 1.11.0 with Visual Studio 2005
Professional Edition, I am getting linker errors for files cppunitd.lib,
msvsprtd.lib as in:

error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol "__declspec(dllimport) public:
char const * __thiscall type_info::name(void)const "
(__imp_?name@type_info@@QBEPBDXZ) referenced in function "public: static
class std::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,class
std::allocator<char> > __cdecl
CppUnit::TypeInfoHelper::getClassName(class type_info const &)"
(?getClassName@TypeInfoHelper@CppUnit@@SA?AV?$basic_string@DU?$char_trai
ts@D@std@@V?$allocator@D@2@@std@@ABVtype_info@@@Z) cppunitd.lib=20

error LNK2005: "class std::basic_ostream<char,struct
std::char_traits<char> > & __cdecl std::operator<<<char,struct
std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> >(class
std::basic_ostream<char,struct std::char_traits<char> > &,class
std::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,class
std::allocator<char> > const &)"
(??$?6DU?$char_traits@D@std@@V?$allocator@D@1@@std@@YAAAV?$basic_ostream
@DU?$char_traits@D@std@@@0@AAV10@ABV?$basic_string@DU?$char_traits@D@std
@@V?$allocator@D@2@@0@@Z) already defined in
cppunitd.lib(TextTestRunner.obj) msvcprtd.lib=20
----------------------------------------------------
I'll forward a partial extraction of what I am getting when I recompile
our software with VS 2005 after my name so you can see that similar
errors (LNK2005 and LNK2019) are involved:
Thanks,
Loreene
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
cl -c -Ic:/home/wildcat/include -Ic:/home/wildcat/include/boost-1_32
-I.. -TP -EHsc -MD -GR -FoCloneableTest.o CloneableTest.cc
Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 14.00.50727.42
for 80x86
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation.  All rights reserved.

CloneableTest.cc
link -out:CloneableTests CloneableTest.o  -LIBPATH:c:/home/wildcat/lib
-SUBSYSTEM:CONSOLE UnitTestMain.lib cppunit.lib
Microsoft (R) Incremental Linker Version 8.00.50727.42
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation.  All rights reserved.

msvcprt.lib(MSVCP80.dll) : error LNK2005: "class
std::basic_ostream<char,struct std::char_traits<char> > & __cdecl
std::operator<<<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,class
std::allocator<char> >(class std::basic_ostream<char,struct
std::char_traits<char> > &,class std::basic_string<char,struct
std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> > const &)"
(??$?6DU?$char_traits@D@std@@V?$allocator@D@1@@std@@YAAAV?$basic_ostream
@DU?$char_traits@D@std@@@0@AAV10@ABV?$basic_string@DU?$char_traits@D@std
@@V?$allocator@D@2@@0@@Z) already defined in cppunit.lib(SourceLine.obj)
msvcprt.lib(MSVCP80.dll) : error LNK2005: "class
std::basic_ostream<char,struct std::char_traits<char> > & __cdecl
std::operator<<<struct std::char_traits<char> >(class
std::basic_ostream<char,struct std::char_traits<char> > &,char const *)"
(??$?6U?$char_traits@D@std@@@std@@YAAAV?$basic_ostream@DU?$char_traits@D
@std@@@0@AAV10@PBD@Z) already defined in
UnitTestMain.lib(CppUnitTestMain.o)
cppunit.lib(TypeInfoHelper.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved external
symbol "__declspec(dllimport) public: char const * __thiscall
type_info::name(void)const " (__imp_?name@type_info@@QBEPBDXZ)
referenced in function "public: static class
std::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,class
std::allocator<char> > __cdecl
CppUnit::TypeInfoHelper::getClassName(class type_info const &)"
(?getClassName@TypeInfoHelper@CppUnit@@SA?AV?$basic_string@DU?$char_trai
ts@D@std@@V?$allocator@D@2@@std@@ABVtype_info@@@Z)
cppunit.lib(StringTools.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol
"__declspec(dllimport) public: class std::basic_string<char,struct
std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> >::const_iterator
__thiscall std::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,class
std::allocator<char> >::end(void)const "
(__imp_?end@?$basic_string@DU?$char_traits@D@std@@V?$allocator@D@2@@std@
@QBE?AVconst_iterator@12@XZ) referenced in function "public: static
class std::vector<class std::basic_string<char,struct
std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> >,class
std::allocator<class std::basic_string<char,struct
std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> > > > __cdecl
CppUnit::StringTools::split(class std::basic_string<char,struct
std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> > const &,char)"
(?split@StringTools@CppUnit@@SA?AV?$vector@V?$basic_string@DU?$char_trai
ts@D@std@@V?$allocator@D@2@@std@@V?$allocator@V?$basic_string@DU?$char_t
raits@D@std@@V?$allocator@D@2@@std@@@2@@std@@ABV?$basic_string@DU?$char_
traits@D@std@@V?$allocator@D@2@@4@D@Z)
cppunit.lib(StringTools.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol
"__declspec(dllimport) public: class std::basic_string<char,struct
std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> >::const_iterator
__thiscall std::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,class
std::allocator<char> >::begin(void)const "
(__imp_?begin@?$basic_string@DU?$char_traits@D@std@@V?$allocator@D@2@@st
d@@QBE?AVconst_iterator@12@XZ) referenced in function "public: static
class std::vector<class std::basic_string<char,struct
std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> >,class
std::allocator<class std::basic_string<char,struct
std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> > > > __cdecl
CppUnit::StringTools::split(class std::basic_string<char,struct
std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> > const &,char)"
(?split@StringTools@CppUnit@@SA?AV?$vector@V?$basic_string@DU?$char_trai
ts@D@std@@V?$allocator@D@2@@std@@V?$allocator@V?$basic_string@DU?$char_t
raits@D@std@@V?$allocator@D@2@@std@@@2@@std@@ABV?$basic_string@DU?$char_
traits@D@std@@V?$allocator@D@2@@4@D@Z)
CloneableTests : fatal error LNK1120: 3 unresolved externals
make[1]: *** [CloneableTests] Error 96

Re: [Cppunit-devel] threading support in cppunit

[CppUnit d. m. l. <cpp...@li...>]

Please cc me in the reply. Thank you. -Bikash

On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Bikash K Agarwalla wrote:

> Hi,
>   I want to use a C++ unit testing framework which supports threads - the
> framework should be thread safe and has support for testing
> multi-threaded programs.
>
>   Also if the framework helps in testing client-server applications,
> that's a big help for my development.
>
>   Can someone please suggest whethere cppunit helps with the above or any
> other recommendations. I looked around the web but didn't find anything
> definitive.
>
> Thanks for your help,
> Bikash
>

[Cppunit-devel] threading support in cppunit

[CppUnit d. m. l. <cpp...@li...>]

Hi,
  I want to use a C++ unit testing framework which supports threads - the
framework should be thread safe and has support for testing
multi-threaded programs.

  Also if the framework helps in testing client-server applications,
that's a big help for my development.

  Can someone please suggest whethere cppunit helps with the above or any
other recommendations. I looked around the web but didn't find anything
definitive.

Thanks for your help,
Bikash

Re: [Cppunit-devel] Question about cppUnit

[CppUnit d. m. l. <cpp...@li...>]

Baptiste -

Any details on how I go about doing this ?

Thanks

Ranji

cppunit-devel mailing list wrote:
> 
> This mecanism is not supported, but you can implement your own test
> factory in a TestSuite subclass.
> 
> Baptiste.
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: CppUnit development mailing list 
>   To: cpp...@li... 
>   Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 9:18 PM
>   Subject: [Cppunit-devel] Question about cppUnit
> 
> 
>   Folks -
> 
>    
> 
>   I am a novice user of cppUnit but a pretty experienced one of JUnit &
> MbUnit. I was wondering if one of you could provide an answer to the
> following query:
> 
>    
> 
>   JUnit & MbUnit have the capability to loop over test cases defined in
> XML files, parse them, dynamically create test cases and run these test
> cases using their respective runners - I was wondering if cppUnit offered
> the same capability so that I could refrain from statically defining all
> my test cases. This would permit me to execute the same sequence of test
> steps though with disparate data defined in these XML files
> 
>    
> 
>   Any hints, suggestions will be greatly appreciated.
> 
>    
> 
>   Thanks
> 
> ---
> Baptiste Lepilleur <bl...@us...>
> CppUnit maintainer
> OpenTest and CppUnit 2 developer.
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> Cppunit-devel mailing list
> Cpp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppunit-devel
> 
> 
Quoted from: 
http://www.nabble.com/Question-about-cppUnit-tf3159691.html#a9142043

Re: [Cppunit-devel] CPP Unit Project Wizard Qustion

[CppUnit d. m. l. <cpp...@li...>]

At the time it was written I guess I would have used 1.10.2.
I am now working in a completely Linux environment so do not even have
access to my old Windows box.
Are you experiencing problems that I can help with?

Please note that I have added further notes to the Wiki page,
http://cppunit.sourceforge.net/cppunit-wiki/CppUnitVisualStudio2005Wizard. If someone is in a position to test them and update the wizard then I would be grateful.

Paul


On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 08:08 -0500, CppUnit development mailing list
wrote:
> Paul,
> 
> What version (1.0, 1.10.2 or 1.12 or all) of the cppunit is the CPP
> Unit Project Wizard intended to be used?
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> John
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________ Cppunit-devel mailing list Cpp...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppunit-devel

[Cppunit-devel] CPP Unit Project Wizard Qustion

[CppUnit d. m. l. <cpp...@li...>]

Paul,

What version (1.0, 1.10.2 or 1.12 or all) of the cppunit is the CPP Unit
Project Wizard intended to be used?

=20

Thanks,

John

[Cppunit-devel] CPPUNIT_ASSERT_THROW double handling of STL std::exception

[CppUnit d. m. l. <cpp...@li...>]

Hi,

I'm new to CppUnit, so I hope this is not a frivolous post.

I would like to use CPPUNIT_ASSERT_THROW to ensure that a function throws an
STL std::exception for specific input conditions. However, this triggers a
compiler error
(C2312 for Microsoft's Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition), which has to do
with having two handlers for the same exception.

I'm using CppUnit version 1.12, but saw an item in the release notes of
version 1.11.4 which indicates that this is indeed the case, and that
CPPUNIT_ASSERT_THROW will not (or should not) compile if used with
std::exception as the exception type. The link to the release notes for
1.11.4 is here:
https://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?group_id=11795&release_id=369052

This behaviour could possibly be altered by minor modifications to the
definition of CPPUNIT_ASSERT_THROW_MESSAGE in testassert.h by using typeid
to check the identity of the "ExceptionType" prior to the try-catch block.

I do not know how many users would want such functionality (as the problem
is easy to work around), but believe it would be an improvement to CppUnit
if the macro performs as advertised in the documentation, even for the
special case of checking std::exception throws. Would such a change be
considered for an upcoming release?

Thanks

Robert

[Cppunit-devel] about CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL()

[CppUnit d. m. l. <cpp...@li...>]

=20
Hi,
     i am using CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(expected value, actual value) in my
test cases.
     When the expected value is not the same as actual value, we get a
failure message and both these values( i.e actual and expected ) are
displayed.
     If the values are same i.e if the assertion was a success , we do
not get any value.
   =20
   I want the CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(expected value, actual value) to
behave in such a way that we get the expected and actual values even if
they are same(i.e. even if it was not a failure).
   I am writing  wrapper on top of it.
   Can u tell me where i need to make changes and what should be my
basic focus on...
=20
  I will be thankful to you.
=20
=20
=20
Regards
Arvind
=20
=20
=20
Arvind Upadhyay
 ge-healthcare@ics <mailto:ge-healthcare@ics>  =20
  =20
=20

[Cppunit-devel] Compiling Money Example on Visual Studio 2005

[CppUnit d. m. l. <cpp...@li...>]

When I compile Money Example of CPPUnit 1.11.0 with Visual Studio 2005 Professional Edition, I am getting linker errors for files cppunitd.lib, msvsprtd.lib as in:
   
  error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol "__declspec(dllimport) public: char const * __thiscall type_info::name(void)const " (__imp_?name@type_info@@QBEPBDXZ) referenced in function "public: static class std::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> > __cdecl CppUnit::TypeInfoHelper::getClassName(class type_info const &)" (?getClassName@TypeInfoHelper@CppUnit@@SA?AV?$basic_string@DU?$char_traits@D@std@@V?$allocator@D@2@@std@@ABVtype_info@@@Z) cppunitd.lib 
   
  error LNK2005: "class std::basic_ostream<char,struct std::char_traits<char> > & __cdecl std::operator<<<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> >(class std::basic_ostream<char,struct std::char_traits<char> > &,class std::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> > const &)" (??$?6DU?$char_traits@D@std@@V?$allocator@D@1@@std@@YAAAV?$basic_ostream@DU?$char_traits@D@std@@@0@AAV10@ABV?$basic_string@DU?$char_traits@D@std@@V?$allocator@D@2@@0@@Z) already defined in cppunitd.lib(TextTestRunner.obj) msvcprtd.lib 
   
  I am sure many of you experts out there have already solved this before. I would appreciate any help.
   
  Thanks!
  Srivalli.



 	 
---------------------------------
Looking for earth-friendly autos? 
 Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center.  

Re: [Cppunit-devel] New warning with MSVC6

[CppUnit d. m. l. <cpp...@li...>]

On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 04:12:51PM +0100, CppUnit development mailing list wrote:
> > An easier fix is to have floatingPointIsFinite() return an int, since
> > that is what isfinite(), finite() and _finite() all do.
> 
> You're right !
> 
> Could someone commit that, please ?

Done.

-Steve