Re: [Cpptool-develop] space problem

[Sven R. <rei...@ma...>]

On Fri, 25 Apr 2003, Baptiste Lepilleur wrote:

> Good.
> 
> I've added a test to SplitDeclarationRefactoringTest for declaration
> occuring inside for statement.
> 
> What should we do in that case ? If we keep the current semantic of the
> refactoring, I think a error should be reported, but on the other hand, we
> could change the refactoring to ExtractDeclarationRefactoring.

For now, I think an error should be reported.
> 
> For a declaration statement, the semantic remaing identical.
> For a declaration occuring in a for statement (initializer), a if or a while
> condition, declarations are extracted before the for statement (tricky, may
> need to add a compound statement).
> 
> What do you think ?

This requires some more sophisticated code analysis, unless we decide to 
always encapsulate  the extracted declaration and the for statement in a 
new compound. Let's keep this on the TODO list.

Sven.

> Baptiste.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sven Reichard" <rei...@ma...>
> To: "CppTool Mailing List" <Cpp...@li...>
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 6:29 PM
> Subject: [Cpptool-develop] space problem
> 
> 
> > I solved the "space problem" that occured when rewriting declarator
> > expression. I'm currently checking in the changes.
> >
> > My past remarks about keeping pointers to deleted elements are obsolete.
> > Sorry about the confusion.
> >
> > Sven.
> >
> > --
> > Sven Reichard
> > Dept. of Math. Sci.
> > University of Delaware
> > rei...@ma...
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Cpptool-develop mailing list
> Cpp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cpptool-develop
> 

-- 
Sven Reichard
Dept. of Math. Sci.
University of Delaware
rei...@ma...