RE: [Cpptool-develop] ToDo list

[Dakshinamurthy K <kd...@su...>]

We are using gcc-3.x for some time now (that is the
officially-released-2.96) and are very happy about it. Quite a few
standard-incompatibilities that existed in 2.95 have been fixed in this.
Can't we plan to work with gcc-3.x directly. Expect this to become the
standard soon...

KD

-----Original Message-----
From: cpp...@li...
[mailto:cpp...@li...]On Behalf Of Sven
Reichard
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 3:43 AM
To: CppTool Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Cpptool-develop] ToDo list


On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Baptiste Lepilleur wrote:

> Do you mean that gcc 2.96 is worth than gcc 2.95 ?

2.96 was sort of an experimental version, never officially released by the
FSF. However, for some reason, many distributors included this version in
their latest releases.

> Thanks. Though, don't lose too much time on this. I expect the boost
issues
> to solve themselves over time.

I'll keep that in mind.
Sven.

--
Sven Reichard
Dept. of Math. Sci.
University of Delaware
rei...@ma...



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility
Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
http://hpc.devchannel.org/
_______________________________________________
Cpptool-develop mailing list
Cpp...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cpptool-develop