From: Sven R. <rei...@ma...> - 2002-12-11 22:13:10
|
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Baptiste Lepilleur wrote: > Do you mean that gcc 2.96 is worth than gcc 2.95 ? 2.96 was sort of an experimental version, never officially released by the FSF. However, for some reason, many distributors included this version in their latest releases. > Thanks. Though, don't lose too much time on this. I expect the boost issues > to solve themselves over time. I'll keep that in mind. Sven. -- Sven Reichard Dept. of Math. Sci. University of Delaware rei...@ma... |