Re: [Cpptool-develop] RenameTemp now support scope

[Baptiste L. <gai...@fr...>]

It's fixed.

Baptiste.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Baptiste Lepilleur" <gai...@fr...>
To: "Sven Reichard" <rei...@ma...>; "CppTool Mailing List"
<Cpp...@li...>
Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 10:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Cpptool-develop] RenameTemp now support scope


> You're right. I checked with VC++ and the variable is indeed accessible in
> the initializer. This sound plain wrong for me, but that the way it is.
> Should be fairly simple to correct though.
>
> Baptiste.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sven Reichard" <rei...@ma...>
> To: "CppTool Mailing List" <Cpp...@li...>
> Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2002 4:59 PM
> Subject: Re: [Cpptool-develop] RenameTemp now support scope
>
>
> > Looks great. However, I think the code below is incorrect, if I
understand
> > the grammar correctly. Stroustrup says something like: The scope of a
> > name starts at the point of its declaration; i.e., after the complete
> > declarator and before the initializer (Stroustrup, 4.9.4, translated
back
> > from German). That means that in the line
> > >         int x = x * taxeRate;
> > the second x already refers to the new variable, i.e., its uninitialized
> > value. So, it should be left unchanged, rather than being refactored to
> > >     int x = price * taxeRate;
> > This is just my theoretical understanding; I'll check if the compiler
> > understands the standard in the same way. If this is true, it should
make
> > the refactoring even easier.
> >
> > Sven.
> >
> > --
> > Sven Reichard
> > Dept. of Math. Sci.
> > University of Delaware
> > rei...@ma...
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Cpptool-develop mailing list
> Cpp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cpptool-develop
>
>