Re: [Cpptool-develop] Linux port

[Sven R. <rei...@ma...>]

On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Baptiste Lepilleur wrote:

> 
> It does work! Good job.
> 
> I do have a few question though:
> 
> Why where aclocal.m4 and makefile.in modfiied in deplib/cppunit ? I'd rather
> keep that as the original version of CppUnit 1.9.10. It's there so it can
> compile (nearly, still need to install boost) out of the box on Windows.

Oops !? I didn't touch these files. So far I'm working with a separately 
installed copy of CppUnit 1.9.10. I'm not sure what went wrong. I'll try 
to reverse the changes.

Now that I think of it, I tried to build CppUnit; that must have changed 
the files, and I did a global commit afterwards.

> You should consider using the CompilerOutputter which provides better
> integration with your compilation environment. Or better, setting up the
> DllPlugInTester to test the unit test DLL. It's really worth it. You get a
> shorter compilation/test cycle, and as such compile more often. It can also
> run tests contained in multiple dll and can produce many kind of output.
> Basically it's the 'ultimate' bootstrap app for unit test.

I'll get to that later. However, my "programming environment" consists of 
emacs and a terminal, where I type "make check" every couple of minutes :) 
So far, compile time is not a problem.

> A gcc 2.96 + STLPort combination might work...

What is STLPort?


Sven.

> Baptiste.
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future 
> of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community 
> Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. 
> http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en
> _______________________________________________
> Cpptool-develop mailing list
> Cpp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cpptool-develop
> 

-- 
Sven Reichard
Dept. of Math. Sci.
University of Delaware
rei...@ma...