From: Sven R. <rei...@ma...> - 2002-10-25 13:38:04
|
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Baptiste Lepilleur wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sven Reichard" <rei...@ma...> > > Folks, > > > > the code submitted by Baptiste looks nice.. from the outside. > > Unfortunately, the extended use of the Boost library is more than gcc 2.96 > > (the most widespread version of the GNU Compiler Collection for Linux) can > > handle <snip> > Hmm, are you refering to lexical_cast ? I just looked over the compiler > status and it seems to be the only one not to compile with gcc 2.95 with > STLPort. I expect the compilation issue for Boost.FileSystem to be fixed > once the development start again. No, it's that some headers (like <ostream>, which is included by <boost/format/format.hpp>) do not exist. > Though, it would be nice if we could compile on gcc 2.95 which it a widely > spread compiler I believe. It would be, but I wouldn't give it top priority. > Are you refering to ParseError destructor and what() methods which should be > marked with throw(), or something else ? Yes, right on. I'll try to fix whatever is necessary. Sven. -- Sven Reichard Dept. of Math. Sci. University of Delaware rei...@ma... |