cpptool-develop

[Cpptool-develop] Added declaration parsing in condition of if, while, and switch statement.

[Baptiste L. <gai...@fr...>]

    Well, the subject said it all. Please, notes that I removed
ScopeGeneratorTest and ScopesHolderTest from the Makefile.

    Andre, you can see the file related to the 'if' condition by looking for
'* added declaration in condition parsing' in the log (I recommend using
sourceforge cvs web interface for this).

    The ScopeGenerator and ScopesHolder test will be removed soon. I'm done
with testing the new IdentifierResolver. I'm tackling the unit tests for
IdentifierResolverContext (which manages local variables visibility).

    Baptiste.

[Cpptool-develop] what about another developer ?

[Andre B. <and...@gm...>]

What about adding me to the developer list and assign the first todo 
item to me ?
Well, i hope this item "Add parsing for 'for' statement condition 
declaration, The resulting AST structure should look like ...."
could be solvable for me.

Just send me a message - I will start. Anyway I still continue looking 
at the sources and trying to understand
the data flow ... :-)

Baptiste Lepilleur wrote:

>    Well, the subject said it all. Please, notes that I removed
>ScopeGeneratorTest and ScopesHolderTest from the Makefile.
>
>    Andre, you can see the file related to the 'if' condition by looking for
>'* added declaration in condition parsing' in the log (I recommend using
>sourceforge cvs web interface for this).
>
I will. However I got now work my WinCVS together with WinMerge.

See, ya
André Baresel

Re: [Cpptool-develop] what about another developer ?

[Baptiste L. <gai...@fr...>]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Andre Baresel" <and...@gm...>
To: "CppTool Mailing List" <Cpp...@li...>
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 9:26 PM
Subject: [Cpptool-develop] what about another developer ?


> What about adding me to the developer list and assign the first todo
> item to me ?

Your welcome Andre, though you'll have to wait for Sven to do it as I don't
have admin right.

Task are self-assigned. Just edit the wiki Todo page and change the status
to 'In Progress' and put your name beside it. Also, send a mail to the ML so
people are notified.

> Well, i hope this item "Add parsing for 'for' statement condition
> declaration, The resulting AST structure should look like ...."
> could be solvable for me.

If you managed to do the 'if condition', it should not be to difficult. Let
us know if you have any issues.

Baptiste.

[...]
>
> See, ya
> André Baresel

Re: [Cpptool-develop] what about another developer ?

[Sven R. <rei...@ma...>]

On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Baptiste Lepilleur wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andre Baresel" <and...@gm...>
> > What about adding me to the developer list and assign the first todo
> > item to me ?
> 
> Your welcome Andre, though you'll have to wait for Sven to do it as I don't
> have admin right.

I should have done that before, and I'm trying to do it now. However, the 
SF server appears to have some problems right now (see message about ML 
archives). I'll let you know when I succeed.

Sven.

-- 
Sven Reichard
Dept. of Math. Sci.
University of Delaware
rei...@ma...

Re: [Cpptool-develop] New local variable resolution mecanism (was: Added declaration parsing in condition of if, while, and switch statement.)

[Baptiste L. <gai...@fr...>]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Baptiste Lepilleur" <gai...@fr...>
To: "CppTool Mailing List" <Cpp...@li...>
Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2002 9:19 PM
Subject: [Cpptool-develop] Added declaration parsing in condition of if,
while, and switch statement.


>     Well, the subject said it all. Please, notes that I removed
> ScopeGeneratorTest and ScopesHolderTest from the Makefile.
>
[...]
>     The ScopeGenerator and ScopesHolder test will be removed soon. I'm
done
> with testing the new IdentifierResolver. I'm tackling the unit tests for
> IdentifierResolverContext (which manages local variables visibility).

Well, I'm finally did it. All the Scope* classes were removed and the code
now use the new IdentifierResolver and IdentifierResolverContext.

Once again the classes are miss-named :-(. IdentifierResolverContext should
be named IdentifierResolver. I would have go ahead and renamed them, but I
can't find a name for the current IdentifierResolver class. Suggestion are
welcome.

IdentifierResolver and IdentifierResolverStrategy are probably a for of the
Director/Builder pattern.
IdentifierResolver does the analysis (entry/exit scope, local variable
declaration...), while IdentifierResolverStrategy process those 'event'.
IdentifierResolverContext is a specialization of IdentifierResolverStrategy.

I expect a few change to come up when we add a specialization of
IdentifierResolverStrategy to detect if it is valid to declare a new locale
variable at a given location (e.g. the identifier is not used in the scope),
and when ReduceTemporary scope is implemented.

Also, it should be fairly easy to extend IdentifierResolverContext to handle
class attributes and methods.

For now, I'll go back to working on the VC6 add-ins (mainly need to add a
generique fixture to test TextDocument interface).

Baptiste.

>     Baptiste.

[Cpptool-develop] Something about CVS and just a question about patterns ...

[Andre B. <and...@gm...>]

Hello Baptiste,

don't bother about the "stdafx.h" problem, I think I was only stumbling 
accross this since
I never used CVS and WinCVS before. But now I just got my own CVS-Server 
working
at home. Just to synchronize the files of my own projects with my laptop 
--- works fine after
I solved the authorization problems.

Since we heavily use another CVS system at work which is a little bit 
more comfortable to
install and run (but to expensive for private use), it was somehow 
difficult to find out how
the the actions are named in CVS/WinCVS but after all I found nearly all 
needed for
adding/ checking /updating files and directories. Btw) Is there any 
possibility to move files
that are allready in the repository from one directory to another and 
this ofcourse together with
all versions that are in the repository ? Did I miss this action in the 
CVS or isn't there such
an operation ? I found this very usefull for restructuring the code some 
time

>IdentifierResolver and IdentifierResolverStrategy are probably a for of the
>Director/Builder pattern.
>IdentifierResolver does the analysis (entry/exit scope, local variable
>declaration...), while IdentifierResolverStrategy process those 'event'.
>IdentifierResolverContext is a specialization of IdentifierResolverStrategy.
>  
>
I wonder if you know about a good book or websides in the area of 
programming patterns,
I ordered some at my company but well, they weren't very useful.

>For now, I'll go back to working on the VC6 add-ins (mainly need to add a
>generique fixture to test TextDocument interface).
>  
>
Nice ! As sven allready wrote - nothing is as good as test with the real 
world environment 8-)

see you than.
-- Andre

[Cpptool-develop] Re: Something about CVS and just a question about patterns ...

[Baptiste L. <gai...@fr...>]

Quoting Andre Baresel <and...@gm...>:

> Hello Baptiste,
> 
> don't bother about the "stdafx.h" problem, I think I was only stumbling
> 
> accross this since
> I never used CVS and WinCVS before. But now I just got my own CVS-Server
> 
> working
> at home. Just to synchronize the files of my own projects with my laptop

I do also have a conflict for stdafx.h whenever I update.

[...]
> the the actions are named in CVS/WinCVS but after all I found nearly all
> needed for
> adding/ checking /updating files and directories. Btw) Is there any 
> possibility to move files
> that are allready in the repository from one directory to another and 
> this ofcourse together with
> all versions that are in the repository ? Did I miss this action in the
> CVS or isn't there such
> an operation ? I found this very usefull for restructuring the code some
> time
Unfortunately, there is no such operation in CVS. File moving or renaming is not
supported. Just add the new file and remove the old one from the repository. 

This is fairly easy to do using WinCVS filters (show unknown files and show
missing files).

[...]
> I wonder if you know about a good book or websides in the area of 
> programming patterns,
> I ordered some at my company but well, they weren't very useful.
> >For now, I'll go back to working on the VC6 add-ins (mainly need to add
> a
> >generique fixture to test TextDocument interface).
Well, I don't know of any good book about pattern. Though concerning pattern,
http://c2.com is the web site of reference. On the other hand, there is some
good website concerning OO design:
- Design Principle articles from Robert Martin (
http://www.objectmentor.com/resources/listArticles?key=topic&topic=Design%20Principles)
- Design up (french), which give a good synthesis of those articles and relate
them to patterns) http://www.design-up.com/

Baptiste.
[...]
> -- Andre

---
Baptiste Lepilleur <gai...@fr...>
http://gaiacrtn.free.fr/index.html
Language: English, French