cpptool-develop

[Cpptool-develop] Attempting to compile on Solaris

[Rohith R. <man...@ho...>]

Hi,
   Ran into a some problems while attempting to compile on sol 2.8 with gcc 
3.2.
1. Lots of warnings about files not ending with a newline: Don't know if 
this is due to some problem with my WinCVS settings or the transfer via ftp 
from windows to the sol server or a genuine compile warning. BTW, do you 
know of any solaris client for CVS? Even a command line one will do, since I 
can write lisp code to make xemacs interface with it.

2. One error about a looser throw in 
DynamicLibraryManagerException::~DynamicLibraryManagerException than its 
base class - which I fixed by adding a throw() at the end of the class. What 
does the throw() at the end of a function say anyway? Just that it throws 
exceptions?

3. Why does the make install step attempt to install cppunit in 
/usr/local/lib? In the server I am working on, I don't have permissions to 
do that. Is it easy to modify the install script and the rest of the 
codebase to install to and use cppunit from a different location, maybe via 
a environment variable?

Thanks,
Rohith.

>From: Sven Reichard <rei...@ma...>
>To: Rohith Rajagopal <man...@ho...>
>Subject: Re: [Cpptool-develop] Hi
>Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 11:42:33 -0500 (EST)
>
>On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Rohith Rajagopal wrote:
>
> > Hi Sven,
> > >I added you to the developers.
> >     Thank you.
> > >Try to get access to the CVS repository via
> > >SSH, get the rfta module, and compile it in your favorite environment.
> >     Yes, I was able to access it using WinCVS. And I've downloaded the 
>rest
> > of the modules as well. I'll try and compile it on sol2.8 with the g++ 
>3.2
> > compiler. Since you've already compiled it in Linux, hopefully I won't 
>run
> > into too many problems with this.
> >     BTW, what are the rest of the modules? CppRefactory and cpptool 
>modules,
> > I mean. Should I be downloading those too?
>
>These were previous attempts. Just get rfta. Then go to deplibs/cppunit,
>configure and make install (unless you already have CppUnit 1.9.10
>installed). You also need the boost library (just the header files; we use
>some of their template classes). Then a ./configure; make check in the
>main directory should work.


_________________________________________________________________
Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband.  
http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp

[Cpptool-develop] Attempting to compile on Solaris

[Sven R. <rei...@ma...>]

On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Rohith Rajagopal wrote:

> Hi,
>    Ran into a some problems while attempting to compile on sol 2.8 with=
 gcc=20
> 3.2.
> 1. Lots of warnings about files not ending with a newline: Don't know i=
f=20
> this is due to some problem with my WinCVS settings or the transfer via=
 ftp=20
> from windows to the sol server or a genuine compile warning.
=20
This is genuine. VC++ by default adds a line like
# endif // myfile_h_include
at the end of the file, w/o a newline. I added newlines to some of the=20
files, but not all of them. When you run into that, feel free to change=20
it.

 > BTW, do you=20
> know of any solaris client for CVS? Even a command line one will do, si=
nce I=20
> can write lisp code to make xemacs interface with it.

Try
which cvs
which ssh

If both are there, just
export CVS_RSH=3Dssh
and then use cvs as usual. If not they should be available in source code=
,=20
e.g., from the FSF. Usually, xemacs has a built-in interface to it; not=20
sure how to make it work w/ ssh though.
=20
> 2. One error about a looser throw in=20
> DynamicLibraryManagerException::~DynamicLibraryManagerException than it=
s=20
> base class - which I fixed by adding a throw() at the end of the class.=
 What=20
> does the throw() at the end of a function say anyway? Just that it thro=
ws=20
> exceptions?

Actually, it says that it doesn't throw any exceptions. A subclass can't=20
throw more exceptions than the parent class, and=20
std::exception::~exception() doesn't throw any. Hence, our destructor=20
can't neither. In general, throw(ex1, ex2, .., exn) says that it throws=20
only the exceptions given in the list, which in our case is empty.
I thought I changed that (since it compiles for me).
=20
> 3. Why does the make install step attempt to install cppunit in=20
> /usr/local/lib? In the server I am working on, I don't have permissions=
 to=20
> do that. Is it easy to modify the install script and the rest of the=20
> codebase to install to and use cppunit from a different location, maybe=
 via=20
> a environment variable?

Call configure as
./configure --prefix=3D<home>
where <home> is your home directory. Then make install. This puts=20
everything in $(HOME)/lib, $(HOME)/include, etc. I think that=20
--prefix=3D$(HOME) doesn't work, so write out the full path.

Sven.


> Thanks,
> Rohith.
>=20
> >From: Sven Reichard <rei...@ma...>
> >To: Rohith Rajagopal <man...@ho...>
> >Subject: Re: [Cpptool-develop] Hi
> >Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 11:42:33 -0500 (EST)
> >
> >On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Rohith Rajagopal wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Sven,
> > > >I added you to the developers.
> > >     Thank you.
> > > >Try to get access to the CVS repository via
> > > >SSH, get the rfta module, and compile it in your favorite environm=
ent.
> > >     Yes, I was able to access it using WinCVS. And I've downloaded =
the=20
> >rest
> > > of the modules as well. I'll try and compile it on sol2.8 with the =
g++=20
> >3.2
> > > compiler. Since you've already compiled it in Linux, hopefully I wo=
n't=20
> >run
> > > into too many problems with this.
> > >     BTW, what are the rest of the modules? CppRefactory and cpptool=
=20
> >modules,
> > > I mean. Should I be downloading those too?
> >
> >These were previous attempts. Just get rfta. Then go to deplibs/cppuni=
t,
> >configure and make install (unless you already have CppUnit 1.9.10
> >installed). You also need the boost library (just the header files; we=
 use
> >some of their template classes). Then a ./configure; make check in the
> >main directory should work.
>=20
>=20
> _________________________________________________________________
> Surf the Web without missing calls!=A0Get MSN Broadband. =20
> http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: ApacheCon, November 18-21 in
> Las Vegas (supported by COMDEX), the only Apache event to be
> fully supported by the ASF. http://www.apachecon.com
> _______________________________________________
> Cpptool-develop mailing list
> Cpp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cpptool-develop
>=20

--=20
Sven Reichard
Dept. of Math. Sci.
University of Delaware
rei...@ma...

[Cpptool-develop] Attempting to compile on Solaris

[Sven R. <rei...@ma...>]

One more thing:

To keep the sources and the object files separated, I recommend the 
following:
From the main directory
mkdir build
cd build
../configure --prefix=<home>
make check

This will build everything inside the "build" directory, and you won't 
accidentally check in .o files.

Sven.


-- 
Sven Reichard
Dept. of Math. Sci.
University of Delaware
rei...@ma...

Re: [Cpptool-develop] Attempting to compile on Solaris

[Baptiste L. <gai...@fr...>]

Well, actually it's not VC++ but my code template. I'm using Workspace Whiz
to generate new classes and unit tests (http://workspacewhiz.com/) using the
template that can be found in src/RftaWorking.WWTpl . It's just that the
last new line was not generated (should be fixed for future classes).

The standard say that included file should end with a new line and that's
why there is a warning. Unfortunately, VC++ 6 won't report those :-(

Baptiste.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Sven Reichard" <rei...@ma...>
To: "CppTool Mailing List" <Cpp...@li...>
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 6:59 PM
Subject: [Cpptool-develop] Attempting to compile on Solaris


On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Rohith Rajagopal wrote:

> Hi,
>    Ran into a some problems while attempting to compile on sol 2.8 with
gcc
> 3.2.
> 1. Lots of warnings about files not ending with a newline: Don't know if
> this is due to some problem with my WinCVS settings or the transfer via
ftp
> from windows to the sol server or a genuine compile warning.

This is genuine. VC++ by default adds a line like
# endif // myfile_h_include
at the end of the file, w/o a newline. I added newlines to some of the
files, but not all of them. When you run into that, feel free to change
it.

 > BTW, do you
> know of any solaris client for CVS? Even a command line one will do, since
I
> can write lisp code to make xemacs interface with it.

Try
which cvs
which ssh

If both are there, just
export CVS_RSH=ssh
and then use cvs as usual. If not they should be available in source code,
e.g., from the FSF. Usually, xemacs has a built-in interface to it; not
sure how to make it work w/ ssh though.

> 2. One error about a looser throw in
> DynamicLibraryManagerException::~DynamicLibraryManagerException than its
> base class - which I fixed by adding a throw() at the end of the class.
What
> does the throw() at the end of a function say anyway? Just that it throws
> exceptions?

Actually, it says that it doesn't throw any exceptions. A subclass can't
throw more exceptions than the parent class, and
std::exception::~exception() doesn't throw any. Hence, our destructor
can't neither. In general, throw(ex1, ex2, .., exn) says that it throws
only the exceptions given in the list, which in our case is empty.
I thought I changed that (since it compiles for me).

> 3. Why does the make install step attempt to install cppunit in
> /usr/local/lib? In the server I am working on, I don't have permissions to
> do that. Is it easy to modify the install script and the rest of the
> codebase to install to and use cppunit from a different location, maybe
via
> a environment variable?

Call configure as
./configure --prefix=<home>
where <home> is your home directory. Then make install. This puts
everything in $(HOME)/lib, $(HOME)/include, etc. I think that
--prefix=$(HOME) doesn't work, so write out the full path.

Sven.


> Thanks,
> Rohith.
[...]

Re: [Cpptool-develop] Attempting to compile on Solaris

[Baptiste L. <gai...@fr...>]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rohith Rajagopal" <man...@ho...>
To: <rei...@ma...>; <cpp...@li...>
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 6:37 PM
Subject: [Cpptool-develop] Attempting to compile on Solaris


> Hi,
>    Ran into a some problems while attempting to compile on sol 2.8 with
gcc
> 3.2.
[...]

> 2. One error about a looser throw in
> DynamicLibraryManagerException::~DynamicLibraryManagerException than its
> base class - which I fixed by adding a throw() at the end of the class.
What
> does the throw() at the end of a function say anyway? Just that it throws
> exceptions?

Where did you had the throw() exactly ? This is a CppUnit portability issue
that I need to fix in the CppUnit project tree. Did you add the destructor ?

> 3. Why does the make install step attempt to install cppunit in
> /usr/local/lib? In the server I am working on, I don't have permissions to
> do that. Is it easy to modify the install script and the rest of the
> codebase to install to and use cppunit from a different location, maybe
via
> a environment variable?

Hmm, This is a copy of CppUnit 1.9.10 tarball (without some of the example
and GUI testrunners). On Windows, this is used so that it can compile nearly
'out of the box' (you still need to install boost, though). The building of
the CppUnit library is integrated with the VC++ projects. Can't this be done
on Unix (installing the lib localy in the build/ dir and using it from
there) ?

Baptiste.

>
> Thanks,
> Rohith.
>
> >From: Sven Reichard <rei...@ma...>
> >To: Rohith Rajagopal <man...@ho...>
> >Subject: Re: [Cpptool-develop] Hi
> >Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 11:42:33 -0500 (EST)
> >
> >On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Rohith Rajagopal wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Sven,
> > > >I added you to the developers.
> > >     Thank you.
> > > >Try to get access to the CVS repository via
> > > >SSH, get the rfta module, and compile it in your favorite
environment.
> > >     Yes, I was able to access it using WinCVS. And I've downloaded the
> >rest
> > > of the modules as well. I'll try and compile it on sol2.8 with the g++
> >3.2
> > > compiler. Since you've already compiled it in Linux, hopefully I won't
> >run
> > > into too many problems with this.
> > >     BTW, what are the rest of the modules? CppRefactory and cpptool
> >modules,
> > > I mean. Should I be downloading those too?
> >
> >These were previous attempts. Just get rfta. Then go to deplibs/cppunit,
> >configure and make install (unless you already have CppUnit 1.9.10
> >installed). You also need the boost library (just the header files; we
use
> >some of their template classes). Then a ./configure; make check in the
> >main directory should work.

Re: [Cpptool-develop] Attempting to compile on Solaris

[Sven R. <rei...@ma...>]

On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Baptiste Lepilleur wrote:
> 
> Hmm, This is a copy of CppUnit 1.9.10 tarball (without some of the example
> and GUI testrunners). On Windows, this is used so that it can compile nearly
> 'out of the box' (you still need to install boost, though). The building of
> the CppUnit library is integrated with the VC++ projects. Can't this be done
> on Unix (installing the lib localy in the build/ dir and using it from
> there) ?
> 
> Baptiste.

I'm not exactly sure you can do this with shared libraries (i.e., dll's). 
You can certainly do this with the static libraries. I'll update the 
makefiles as soon as I have solved my current computer problems 
(installing a hardware modem to have internet access under Linux).

Sven.


-- 
Sven Reichard
Dept. of Math. Sci.
University of Delaware
rei...@ma...