cpptool-develop

[Cpptool-develop] Linux port

[Sven R. <rei...@ma...>]

I got it to run under Linux, and committed the changes. I had to fix a 
couple of source files, so make sure it still runs under Windows.

So far only the rftaparser directory works; I divided the code into a 
library, librfta.a, and the testing program, UnitTest. Building it is 
still a bit tricky, e.g., needs gcc 3.x. Is anybody else here using Linux? 
I will update the installation instructions in a while. 

Sven.

-- 
Sven Reichard
Dept. of Math. Sci.
University of Delaware
rei...@ma...

Re: [Cpptool-develop] Linux port

[Sven R. <rei...@ma...>]

The ASTDumper example program runs. I haven't committed the changes yet. 
The weird thing is: The output doesn't display on my version of netscape; 
I have long suspected that there's something wrong with that version. 
However, it looks fine under lynx - a text-based (!) HTML-browser.

Cheers,
Sven.

-- 
Sven Reichard
Dept. of Math. Sci.
University of Delaware
rei...@ma...

Re: [Cpptool-develop] Linux port

[Baptiste L. <gai...@fr...>]

Glad to know that lynx is not disturbed by the nested table. The only thing
I can think of that might disturb Netscape are the <P> </P>. It's fairly
basic HTML otherwise. Works fine with Netscape 6.2 though.

Baptiste.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Sven Reichard" <rei...@ma...>
To: "CppTool Mailing List" <Cpp...@li...>
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 7:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Cpptool-develop] Linux port


> The ASTDumper example program runs. I haven't committed the changes yet.
> The weird thing is: The output doesn't display on my version of netscape;
> I have long suspected that there's something wrong with that version.
> However, it looks fine under lynx - a text-based (!) HTML-browser.
>
> Cheers,
> Sven.
>
> --
> Sven Reichard
> Dept. of Math. Sci.
> University of Delaware
> rei...@ma...
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future
> of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community
> Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now.
> http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en
> _______________________________________________
> Cpptool-develop mailing list
> Cpp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cpptool-develop
>
>

Re: [Cpptool-develop] Linux port

[Baptiste L. <gai...@fr...>]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Sven Reichard" <rei...@ma...>
To: "CppTool Mailing List" <Cpp...@li...>
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 5:52 PM
Subject: [Cpptool-develop] Linux port


> I got it to run under Linux, and committed the changes. I had to fix a
> couple of source files, so make sure it still runs under Windows.

It does work! Good job.

I do have a few question though:

Why where aclocal.m4 and makefile.in modfiied in deplib/cppunit ? I'd rather
keep that as the original version of CppUnit 1.9.10. It's there so it can
compile (nearly, still need to install boost) out of the box on Windows.

> So far only the rftaparser directory works; I divided the code into a
> library, librfta.a, and the testing program, UnitTest. Building it is

You should consider using the CompilerOutputter which provides better
integration with your compilation environment. Or better, setting up the
DllPlugInTester to test the unit test DLL. It's really worth it. You get a
shorter compilation/test cycle, and as such compile more often. It can also
run tests contained in multiple dll and can produce many kind of output.
Basically it's the 'ultimate' bootstrap app for unit test.

> still a bit tricky, e.g., needs gcc 3.x. Is anybody else here using Linux?
> I will update the installation instructions in a while.

A gcc 2.96 + STLPort combination might work...

Baptiste.
>
> Sven.
>
> --
> Sven Reichard
> Dept. of Math. Sci.
> University of Delaware
> rei...@ma...

Re: [Cpptool-develop] Linux port

[Sven R. <rei...@ma...>]

On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Baptiste Lepilleur wrote:

> 
> It does work! Good job.
> 
> I do have a few question though:
> 
> Why where aclocal.m4 and makefile.in modfiied in deplib/cppunit ? I'd rather
> keep that as the original version of CppUnit 1.9.10. It's there so it can
> compile (nearly, still need to install boost) out of the box on Windows.

Oops !? I didn't touch these files. So far I'm working with a separately 
installed copy of CppUnit 1.9.10. I'm not sure what went wrong. I'll try 
to reverse the changes.

Now that I think of it, I tried to build CppUnit; that must have changed 
the files, and I did a global commit afterwards.

> You should consider using the CompilerOutputter which provides better
> integration with your compilation environment. Or better, setting up the
> DllPlugInTester to test the unit test DLL. It's really worth it. You get a
> shorter compilation/test cycle, and as such compile more often. It can also
> run tests contained in multiple dll and can produce many kind of output.
> Basically it's the 'ultimate' bootstrap app for unit test.

I'll get to that later. However, my "programming environment" consists of 
emacs and a terminal, where I type "make check" every couple of minutes :) 
So far, compile time is not a problem.

> A gcc 2.96 + STLPort combination might work...

What is STLPort?


Sven.

> Baptiste.
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future 
> of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community 
> Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. 
> http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en
> _______________________________________________
> Cpptool-develop mailing list
> Cpp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cpptool-develop
> 

-- 
Sven Reichard
Dept. of Math. Sci.
University of Delaware
rei...@ma...

Re: [Cpptool-develop] Linux port

[Baptiste L. <gai...@fr...>]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Sven Reichard" <rei...@ma...>
To: "CppTool Mailing List" <Cpp...@li...>
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Cpptool-develop] Linux port


> On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Baptiste Lepilleur wrote:
>
[...]

> > A gcc 2.96 + STLPort combination might work...
>
> What is STLPort?
http://stlport.org/

It's a free, open-source implementation of STL, which I'm told is quite
portable and fairly good (use concept check and has debug iterator). In
fact, Borland shipped it with Borland C++ 6.0. My guess is that it should
get ride of most STL issue for gcc 2.9.6.

Baptiste.