From: Andras V. <and...@ui...> - 2013-11-15 10:20:31
|
The present version in the AUR doesn’t compile on my box. I think the failure is in the compilation of the texinfo part. I think this part is completely unnecessary since everyone will use the pdf documentation anyway. So I think we should do only a make lib Dr. Andras Vukics Institute for Theoretical Physics University of Innsbruck On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Andras Vukics <and...@ui...>wrote: > I also think it is best to only provide the patched version on AUR. Then we >> will have the official 0.10 release and our -hg version which adds the >> patches. >> But I don't know if it is polite to keep the name in this case. Maybe we >> should make it clear that this is essentially a fork? >> > > I suggest that we call it cppqed-blitz. > > By the way, the dependence on boost would only change from an optional one >> to >> a required one for the upstream project. >> > > That’s right, because it optionally depends on Boost.Serialization – this > I forgot. > > The switch to Boost.MultiArray would probably a lot of work, would it not? >> Even after re-implementing the traits, the blitz interface could be >> exposed to >> a lot of places via getArray. >> > > Yes, the blitz-dependence goes rather deep, and that’s why I haven’t > started migrating yet :) . But it’s worth thinking about. > > |