From: Andras V. <and...@ui...> - 2013-11-14 22:09:12
|
> > I also think it is best to only provide the patched version on AUR. Then we > will have the official 0.10 release and our -hg version which adds the > patches. > But I don't know if it is polite to keep the name in this case. Maybe we > should make it clear that this is essentially a fork? > I suggest that we call it cppqed-blitz. By the way, the dependence on boost would only change from an optional one > to > a required one for the upstream project. > That’s right, because it optionally depends on Boost.Serialization – this I forgot. The switch to Boost.MultiArray would probably a lot of work, would it not? > Even after re-implementing the traits, the blitz interface could be > exposed to > a lot of places via getArray. > Yes, the blitz-dependence goes rather deep, and that’s why I haven’t started migrating yet :) . But it’s worth thinking about. |