Re: [Cppqed-support] new tcc include scheme

[Raimar S. <rai...@ui...>]

Dear András,

I removed MCWF.h and added explicit template instantiations for BinarySystem. 
The result is in raimar/tccStaging, and it compiles in release mode again.

Best regards
Raimar

On Monday 13 August 2012 11:04:59 Andras Vukics wrote:
> Dear Raimar,
> 
> To me, everything you did here seems fine, I have only one small question:
> * Why is there a separate MCWF.h, and if there is, why does
> Evolution.h not include it ? EvolutionHigh.h used to pull in
> everything needed to evolve on quantumtrajectories.
> 
> Please check out the branch tccStaging where I have updated
> utils/testsuite and corrected a few small problems. The testsuite can
> be run simply with
> bjam (release)
> in the utils/testsuite folder.
> 
> I made a small test, and compilation dependencies have indeed
> decreased with this scheme:
> 
> quantumdata/impl/StateVector.tcc: 51 targets depends on it (used to be
> 58 targets)
> elements/frees/impl/Mode.tcc: 32 targets (58 targets)
> 
> utils/include/impl/Evolved.tcc: 50 targets (60 targets)
> utils/include/impl/BlitzArraySliceIterator.tcc: 50 targets (54 targets)
> 
> Thanks and best regards,
> András
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 2:03 AM, Raimar Sandner
> 
> <rai...@ui...> wrote:
> > Dear András,
> > 
> > I have pushed raimar/tcc_new (and removed raimar/tcc). Tcc_new is already
> > branched from the latest r229 of master so that you don't need to merge
> > with the binary and composite changesets again.
> > 
> > I tried to stick to what we have discussed recently and also updated the
> > code organization rationales accordingly (raimar/Documentation).
> > 
> > Please note that I have also converted the pair
> > BlitzArraySlieIterator.h/tcc to the new style by defining the macros in a
> > separate file which is included in both headers. Now the tcc scheme is
> > consistent across the framework, but if you don't like this approach just
> > leave out the last commit when you merge.
> > 
> > Furthermore I have added LazyDensityOperator.tcc, and converted some of
> > the
> > frees headers to Free_.h so that Free.h can bundle Free_.h (or
> > impl/Free.tcc if present) together with ParsFree.h. However, I have not
> > changed the interaction header files in the same way yet. Currently these
> > are not used anywhere in the framework and Pars... headers are just
> > included in the corresponding interaction header file, so script users
> > have only to include this one header file anyway.
> > 
> > Best regards
> > Raimar
> > 
> > 
> > PS: probably the testsuites are pretty much broken right now because of
> > all
> > these changes, but I could not start them to check. How do I run the tests
> > with bjam again?
> > 
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ---- Live Security Virtual Conference
> > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Cppqed-support mailing list
> > Cpp...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppqed-support