Re: [Cppqed-support] new tcc include scheme

[Andras V. <and...@ui...>]

Dear Raimar,

To me, everything you did here seems fine, I have only one small question:
* Why is there a separate MCWF.h, and if there is, why does
Evolution.h not include it ? EvolutionHigh.h used to pull in
everything needed to evolve on quantumtrajectories.

Please check out the branch tccStaging where I have updated
utils/testsuite and corrected a few small problems. The testsuite can
be run simply with
bjam (release)
in the utils/testsuite folder.

I made a small test, and compilation dependencies have indeed
decreased with this scheme:

quantumdata/impl/StateVector.tcc: 51 targets depends on it (used to be
58 targets)
elements/frees/impl/Mode.tcc: 32 targets (58 targets)

utils/include/impl/Evolved.tcc: 50 targets (60 targets)
utils/include/impl/BlitzArraySliceIterator.tcc: 50 targets (54 targets)

Thanks and best regards,
András



On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 2:03 AM, Raimar Sandner
<rai...@ui...> wrote:
> Dear András,
>
> I have pushed raimar/tcc_new (and removed raimar/tcc). Tcc_new is already
> branched from the latest r229 of master so that you don't need to merge with
> the binary and composite changesets again.
>
> I tried to stick to what we have discussed recently and also updated the code
> organization rationales accordingly (raimar/Documentation).
>
> Please note that I have also converted the pair BlitzArraySlieIterator.h/tcc
> to the new style by defining the macros in a separate file which is included in
> both headers. Now the tcc scheme is consistent across the framework, but if
> you don't like this approach just leave out the last commit when you merge.
>
> Furthermore I have added LazyDensityOperator.tcc, and converted some of the
> frees headers to Free_.h so that Free.h can bundle Free_.h (or impl/Free.tcc
> if present) together with ParsFree.h. However, I have not changed the
> interaction header files in the same way yet. Currently these are not used
> anywhere in the framework and Pars... headers are just included in the
> corresponding interaction header file, so script users have only to include
> this one header file anyway.
>
> Best regards
> Raimar
>
>
> PS: probably the testsuites are pretty much broken right now because of all
> these changes, but I could not start them to check. How do I run the tests
> with bjam again?
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> Cppqed-support mailing list
> Cpp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppqed-support