From: Raimar S. <rai...@ui...> - 2012-04-19 08:31:48
|
Dear András, I want to look into this problem a little bit more. You closed the bug about the erroneous parsing of the timestep as invalid, but it seems to be a valid bug. The timestep is read in as 1 which is clearly wrong or am I mistaken? Best regards Raimar On Friday 30 March 2012 00:03:46 Andras Vukics wrote: > I could already detect the error at T=30 (after several continuations). > There is also a hint of some bug, cf. > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3512988&group_id=187775&atid > =922653 > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Andras Vukics <and...@ui...>wrote: > > Dear Raimar, > > I've started to experiment, and try to reproduce your error. > > Just a quick question: did you try in debug mode? > > András > > > > > > |