cppqed-support

[Cppqed-support] separate branches for stable and development

[Raimar S. <rai...@ui...>]

Dear András,

I think we should introduce two branches beneath cppqed, one called "stable" 
and one "development". I will continue to use the development version in daily 
work to test it, then we can merge to stable from time to time. Eventually 
stable leads up to releases. Casual users or course participants can be 
directed to download the stable branch.

At the moment there seem to be several problems with our official branch which 
prevent compilation for example with gcc-4.4 (I will investigate this and 
report back). The development branch will help to catch problems which are not 
immediately visible.

Best regards
Raimar

Re: [Cppqed-support] separate branches for stable and development

[Andras V. <and...@ui...>]

Dear Raimar,
Agreed.
However, we should identify the present main branch with either the stable
or the development. I don’t know which one is better. Perhaps it should be
the stable, since in that case the users do not need to meddle with branch
names when downloading.
Best regards,
András



Dr. Andras Vukics
Institute for Theoretical Physics
University of Innsbruck


On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Raimar Sandner
<rai...@ui...>wrote:

> Dear András,
>
> I think we should introduce two branches beneath cppqed, one called
> "stable"
> and one "development". I will continue to use the development version in
> daily
> work to test it, then we can merge to stable from time to time. Eventually
> stable leads up to releases. Casual users or course participants can be
> directed to download the stable branch.
>
> At the moment there seem to be several problems with our official branch
> which
> prevent compilation for example with gcc-4.4 (I will investigate this and
> report back). The development branch will help to catch problems which are
> not
> immediately visible.
>
> Best regards
> Raimar
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer
> Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013
> and get the hardware for free! Learn more.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb
> _______________________________________________
> Cppqed-support mailing list
> Cpp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppqed-support
>

Re: [Cppqed-support] separate branches for stable and development

[Andras V. <and...@ui...>]

I have reverted the main branch to something like the former revision #264,
but with some features from the development branch and raimar/gcc included,
and 4qbits.cc and 6qbits.cc removed.
This now compiles for me on two somewhat different platforms with gcc-4.4,
gcc-4.6 and clang.
The development branch is under
bzr://cppqed.bzr.sourceforge.net/bzrroot/cppqed/Development


Dr. Andras Vukics
Institute for Theoretical Physics
University of Innsbruck


On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Raimar Sandner
<rai...@ui...>wrote:

> Dear András,
>
> we can only use the current branch as stable if we sort out all the
> problems
> which occur. We should take a revision which reportedly works on all
> supported
> platform with all supported compilers.
>
> Which compiler do you use for daily work? I found that g++ 4.6 needs the
> additional -std=c++0x flag. On the other hand the options
>  "-Wno-local-type-
> template-args" and "-Wno-c++11-extensions" are not known.
>
> Best
> Raimar
>
>
> > Dear Raimar,
> > Agreed.
> > However, we should identify the present main branch with either the
> stable
> > or the development. I don’t know which one is better. Perhaps it should
> be
> > the stable, since in that case the users do not need to meddle with
> branch
> > names when downloading.
> > Best regards,
> > András
> >
> >
> >
> > Dr. Andras Vukics
> > Institute for Theoretical Physics
> > University of Innsbruck
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Raimar Sandner
> >
> > <rai...@ui...>wrote:
> > > Dear András,
> > >
> > > I think we should introduce two branches beneath cppqed, one called
> > > "stable"
> > > and one "development". I will continue to use the development version
> in
> > > daily
> > > work to test it, then we can merge to stable from time to time.
> Eventually
> > > stable leads up to releases. Casual users or course participants can be
> > > directed to download the stable branch.
> > >
> > > At the moment there seem to be several problems with our official
> branch
> > > which
> > > prevent compilation for example with gcc-4.4 (I will investigate this
> and
> > > report back). The development branch will help to catch problems which
> are
> > > not
> > > immediately visible.
> > >
> > > Best regards
> > > Raimar
> > >
> > >
> > >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ---- Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer
> > > Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013
> > > and get the hardware for free! Learn more.
> > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Cppqed-support mailing list
> > > Cpp...@li...
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppqed-support
>

Re: [Cppqed-support] separate branches for stable and development

[Raimar S. <rai...@ui...>]

Great, seems to work fine. I will also check in on Mac if I find time...

Meanwhile, could you merge cppqed/raimar and cppqed/raimar/Documentation?

Thanks!
Raimar

On Wednesday 13 February 2013 09:33:10 Andras Vukics wrote:
> I have reverted the main branch to something like the former revision #264,
> but with some features from the development branch and raimar/gcc included,
> and 4qbits.cc and 6qbits.cc removed.
> This now compiles for me on two somewhat different platforms with gcc-4.4,
> gcc-4.6 and clang.
> The development branch is under
> bzr://cppqed.bzr.sourceforge.net/bzrroot/cppqed/Development
> 
> 
> Dr. Andras Vukics
> Institute for Theoretical Physics
> University of Innsbruck
> 
> 
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Raimar Sandner
> 
> <rai...@ui...>wrote:
> > Dear András,
> > 
> > we can only use the current branch as stable if we sort out all the
> > problems
> > which occur. We should take a revision which reportedly works on all
> > supported
> > platform with all supported compilers.
> > 
> > Which compiler do you use for daily work? I found that g++ 4.6 needs the
> > additional -std=c++0x flag. On the other hand the options
> > 
> >  "-Wno-local-type-
> > 
> > template-args" and "-Wno-c++11-extensions" are not known.
> > 
> > Best
> > Raimar
> > 
> > > Dear Raimar,
> > > Agreed.
> > > However, we should identify the present main branch with either the
> > 
> > stable
> > 
> > > or the development. I don’t know which one is better. Perhaps it should
> > 
> > be
> > 
> > > the stable, since in that case the users do not need to meddle with
> > 
> > branch
> > 
> > > names when downloading.
> > > Best regards,
> > > András
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Dr. Andras Vukics
> > > Institute for Theoretical Physics
> > > University of Innsbruck
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Raimar Sandner
> > > 
> > > <rai...@ui...>wrote:
> > > > Dear András,
> > > > 
> > > > I think we should introduce two branches beneath cppqed, one called
> > > > "stable"
> > > > and one "development". I will continue to use the development version
> > 
> > in
> > 
> > > > daily
> > > > work to test it, then we can merge to stable from time to time.
> > 
> > Eventually
> > 
> > > > stable leads up to releases. Casual users or course participants can
> > > > be
> > > > directed to download the stable branch.
> > > > 
> > > > At the moment there seem to be several problems with our official
> > 
> > branch
> > 
> > > > which
> > > > prevent compilation for example with gcc-4.4 (I will investigate this
> > 
> > and
> > 
> > > > report back). The development branch will help to catch problems which
> > 
> > are
> > 
> > > > not
> > > > immediately visible.
> > > > 
> > > > Best regards
> > > > Raimar
> > 
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > > > ---- Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer
> > > > Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013
> > > > and get the hardware for free! Learn more.
> > > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Cppqed-support mailing list
> > > > Cpp...@li...
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppqed-support