While I agree that some compilers support this, I dont see this as being any official native datatype. Can you point me to something that shows it is a native official data type and not some stop gap type
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
is_fundamental is reserved for fundamental data types. int128 isnt listed in http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/types as one of the fundamental types. I dont think it makes sense to add this patch based on this.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Unfortunately there is no official standardization working in this direction afaik. Just thought that it would be neat, given the fact that gcc, clang and boost support it. So close it, as won't-fix, if you like to.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
While I agree that some compilers support this, I dont see this as being any official native datatype. Can you point me to something that shows it is a native official data type and not some stop gap type
is_fundamental is reserved for fundamental data types. int128 isnt listed in http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/types as one of the fundamental types. I dont think it makes sense to add this patch based on this.
Unfortunately there is no official standardization working in this direction afaik. Just thought that it would be neat, given the fact that gcc, clang and boost support it. So close it, as won't-fix, if you like to.
closing