Re: [Cppcms-users] Kindly assist

[M-e-ch T. <mec...@gm...>]

the patch did better though the same problem reincured at 36%.
Clang and platform are in the log file.
Thank you for taking your time to help me .
Am fairly new to programming


On Fri, Sep 4, 2020, 3:39 PM M-e-ch Technologies <
mec...@gm...> wrote:

> *[ 29%] Linking C executable external_session_test*
> */data/data/com.termux/files/usr/bin/arm-linux-androideabi-ld:
> libcppcms.so.2.0.0.beta1: undefined reference to `__atomic_fetch_sub_4'*
> */data/data/com.termux/files/usr/bin/arm-linux-androideabi-ld:
> libcppcms.so.2.0.0.beta1: undefined reference to `__atomic_load_4'*
> */data/data/com.termux/files/usr/bin/arm-linux-androideabi-ld:
> libcppcms.so.2.0.0.beta1: undefined reference to `__atomic_fetch_add_4'*
> *clang-10: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see
> invocation)*
> *make[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/external_session_test.dir/build.make:110:
> external_session_test] Error 1*
> *make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:314:
> CMakeFiles/external_session_test.dir/all] Error 2*
> *make: *** [Makefile:182: all] Error 2*
>
>
>
> I am to cppcms and c++ in general how do I solve the above error
>
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2020, 11:17 PM Artyom Beilis <art...@gm...>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello Dear CppCMS users
>>
>> Have anybody used raw or asynchronous_raw with http_response?
>>
>> I'm doing some changes for HTTP/1.1+websockets+performance improvement
>> support.
>> The original CppCMS design had an underlying assumption that the basic
>> communication protocol is derivative of CGI protocols - FastCGI, SCGI.
>>
>> So when http web server was added it actually parsed CGI output headers
>> and converted them to HTTP ones. Thus use of raw/asynchronos_raw mode when
>> the user writes his own CGI headers instead of generating them via
>> http_response API was reasonable.
>>
>> Today I want to make an HTTP protocol 1st class citizen in CppCMS - which
>> means that I don't silently assume that all IO is CGI based. It is actually
>> a requirement for extensions like WebSockets and other things that can't be
>> passed via *CGI like protocols.
>>
>> Removing "raw" *CGI I/O would simplify the task. I can implement it via
>> an intermediate CGI parser but it isn't the most trivial task.
>>
>> So I need to understand if anybody actually uses this feature or I can
>> remove it in CppCMS 2.0.0?
>>
>> Artyom Beilis
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cppcms-users mailing list
>> Cpp...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users
>>
>