Re: [Cppcms-users] Anybody uses cppcms::http::http_response io_mode raw or asynchronous_raw?

[Fernando F. <die...@gm...>]

Hi,

I use "raw_post_data" to parse json, and use it for REST.

(char *) request (). raw_post_data (). first

In service implementation I also widely use "raw_post_data".


El mar., 1 sept. 2020 a las 15:17, Artyom Beilis (<art...@gm...>)
escribió:

> Hello Dear CppCMS users
>
> Have anybody used raw or asynchronous_raw with http_response?
>
> I'm doing some changes for HTTP/1.1+websockets+performance improvement
> support.
> The original CppCMS design had an underlying assumption that the basic
> communication protocol is derivative of CGI protocols - FastCGI, SCGI.
>
> So when http web server was added it actually parsed CGI output headers
> and converted them to HTTP ones. Thus use of raw/asynchronos_raw mode when
> the user writes his own CGI headers instead of generating them via
> http_response API was reasonable.
>
> Today I want to make an HTTP protocol 1st class citizen in CppCMS - which
> means that I don't silently assume that all IO is CGI based. It is actually
> a requirement for extensions like WebSockets and other things that can't be
> passed via *CGI like protocols.
>
> Removing "raw" *CGI I/O would simplify the task. I can implement it via an
> intermediate CGI parser but it isn't the most trivial task.
>
> So I need to understand if anybody actually uses this feature or I can
> remove it in CppCMS 2.0.0?
>
> Artyom Beilis
> _______________________________________________
> Cppcms-users mailing list
> Cpp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users
>