Re: [Cppcms-users] Next CppCMS Feature Poll

[<ma...@al...>]

<div dir='auto'><div>Hello Artyom,&nbsp;</div><div dir="auto">I'd Vote also for Option 4. It would be great if cppcms would use cpp11 standards.&nbsp;</div><div dir="auto">Thank you very much!</div><div dir="auto">Best regards,</div><div dir="auto">Alex Mack<br><div class="gmail_extra" dir="auto"><br><div class="gmail_quote">Am 10.08.2020 21:01 schrieb Artyom Beilis &lt;art...@gm...&gt;:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p dir="ltr">Hello All,
<br>

<br>
Following the discussion I want to make a commitment to implement a
<br>
new feature required by the community. Here my options:
<br>

<br>
1. HTTP/1.1 support - it would allow keep alive support and better
<br>
performance overall for multiple requests. It would allow future
<br>
implementation of web sockets.
<br>
2. Multiple-Event-Loop support - today there is only 1 event loop for
<br>
the service and it can be a bottleneck for small requests on systems
<br>
with high core count
<br>
3. SSL support - for embedded systems that need proper web server
<br>
4. C++11 cleanup - replace all booster primitives that exist in C++11
<br>
with standard (shared_ptr, thread, mutex, etc) provide move
<br>
constructors for many objects, replace auto_ptr by unique_ptr.
<br>

<br>
Feel free to suggest other ideas that you can think of that would be beneficial
<br>

<br>
Artyom Beilis
<br>

<br>

<br>
_______________________________________________
<br>
Cppcms-users mailing list
<br>
Cpp...@li...
<br>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users
<br>
</p>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>