Re: [Cppcms-users] Proposal to release CppCMS 2.0 and migrate to C++11

[Artyom B. <art...@gm...>]

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 5:40 PM, sergey lavrov <ccp...@gm...> wrote:

> fyi found today c++ mvc framework in active development state
> http://www.treefrogframework.org/. development going on github (what we
> asked artyom many times),

Give me a brake... but this is just an excuse.

If you want to contribute
do it and you'll get all you need and if the contributors community perfers
git it will get it. Now the contributors community is ME... so I choose
what ever I need - espesially since I have testing infrastructure that
uses SVN and switching to git would require me to spend lots
of work hours on it instead of actually dealing with CppCMS.

So stop complaining and staring contributing!
You want a task? I'll give you ;-)

> epoll/thread, two template engines, db access,
> better license, has all features that cppcms has or even more ...

I know it I even remember looking on it and reviewing some code
discovering some basic
design issues (race condition in session management) talking to the designer...

It integrated lots of ides from CppCMS in its own way but IMHO
didn't come close to the maturity of CppCMS and its documentation....
CppCMS's one is bright shine ;-)

> it's really sad that cppcms almost died ...
>

Don't make funeral too soon. It isn't dead at all. I just manage to work
on it in bursts when my personal life allows. All the good stuff
is in trunk and from what I see most of users run on CppCMS trunk.

Because I can't live off CppCMS and I spend the time I can on it and there
are periods I can't. But the project is far from being dead. There was huge work
done about 1/2 a year ago that brought lots of good stuff and I don't
see complains.

So instead declaring it dead and making up excuses why you can't help
get your hands dirty in C++ and start writing the code.

Artyom