Re: [Cppcms-users] Proposal to release CppCMS 2.0 and migrate to C++11

[Artyom B. <art...@gm...>]

> However, I am not saying that I am absolutely comfortable with the
> quality of CppCMS documentation.  In fact, I sometimes spent hours
> reading the documentation struggling to understand the usage of only one
> class method, but in the end I had to guess and test it in order to get
> an idea of its functionality.  Therefore, if I can vote, I will place
> improving the quality of documentation as the first entry in the to-do
> list.
>

Unfortunately I agree on this.

I must say lots of contribution was done by the community in the wiki and
btw in the docs themselves. It is easier to do.

But what is more important is to ask if something is unclear or point it
out as stuff like this need to be documented.

>
> - English is not my native speaking language.

Neither it is my ;-)... guys constantly fix my bad English around.

> I have no idea what I can do about these "trends".  Perhaps the best we
> community members can do at this moment is making your own CppCMS
> applications great - so great that they make your businesses so
> successful that your organizations grow and expand and therefore begin
> to hire top end programmers to work exclusively on CppCMS framework.

EXACTLY...

>
> Please pardon me if you do not agree with my view points! After all,
> this is the 2 cents all I have at this moment.
>
> Best Regards,
> CN
>