Re: [Cppcms-users] CppCMS 1.1 Progress report (scoop 1st beta is coming...)

[陈抒 <csf...@gm...>]

the table shows not correctly in previous email, I  upload the screenshot
here.

cpu,mem and request/sec have three number:  min, max and average.

[image: Inline image 2]

our hardware information:


[image: Inline image 3]





Dean Chen
Best regards
http://blog.csdn.net/csfreebird

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 2:13 PM, 陈抒 <csf...@gm...> wrote:

> Compare with other languages, c++ cppcms is faster. But my team did
> benchmark a few months ago, we found the qps of mudoo is best, libevent is
> much faster than boost asio and cppcms. We use two client servers to send
> requests to one target server which runs four rest server based on mudoo,
> libevent, boost:asio and cppcms one by one.
>
> Below is our benchmark resutl.
>
> Table 5: more details httpserver all versions
> benchmarkServerCompilerOptimization
> optionCpuMemDiskNetcard(in/out)Requests/seccppcms_basedclang++ 3.6.2-O3228%
> / 239% / 228%9356 / 9416 / 9416--14252 / 16124 / 15820asio_basedclang++
> 3.6.2-O3300% / 305% / 303%4368 / 4564 /4416--33069 / 34247 /
> 33360libevent_basedclang++ 3.6.2-O3763% / 764% / 764%5560 / 10M /
> 5520--113373 / 114072 / 113713muduo_basedclang++ 3.6.2-O3650% / 694% /
> 658%6272 / 6324 / 6312--303202 / 307204 / 305839
> We are not  professional benchmark team, Artyom, you can do this yourself
> to make sure our conclusion is correct. We can provide our rest server code
> implemented by above four c++  framworks if you needed.
>
> Hope cppcms becomes faster and faster in the future. We really love it
> when developing web site. LibEvent's performance is good, but we only use
> it to build rest server instead of web site because the code style is too
> low level and ugly.
>
>
>
> Dean Chen
> Best regards
> http://blog.csdn.net/csfreebird
>
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 11:48 PM, CN <cn...@fa...> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015, at 06:20 PM, Artyom Beilis wrote:
>>
>> I want you guys to looking on it - try to build the version from trunk,
>> try new API *and report your impressions*.
>>
>>
>> Hi! Artyom,
>>
>> It's very nice to know CppCMS is under active development :-)
>>
>> I have just switched to application_specific_pool and have not
>> encountered any issue with this new API *during last 10 minutes* :-)
>>
>> Meanwhile, I want to take this chance to show off my modifications to my
>> local version of rpc_json.cpp as follows:
>>
>> * Comment out line 162:
>>    BOOSTER_DEBUG("cppcms") << "JSON-RPC Method call:" << method();
>>
>> * Change line 181 from
>>    return_error("Invalid parameters");
>>    to
>>    return_error("Invalid parameters passed to JSON RPC method
>> \""+method()+"\"");
>>
>> * Change line 191 from
>>    return_error("Internal Service Error");
>>    to
>>    return_error("Invalid JSON RPC method: "+method());
>>
>> CppCMS rocks! Simply can not find a single reason not using this superb
>> product and learning much C++ skills from it.
>>
>> Happy new year!
>> CN
>>
>> -- http://www.fastmail.com - Email service worth paying for. Try it for free
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cppcms-users mailing list
>> Cpp...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users
>>
>>
>