Re: [Cppcms-users] CppCMS 1.1 Progress report (scoop 1st beta is coming...)

[陈抒 <csf...@gm...>]

Compare with other languages, c++ cppcms is faster. But my team did
benchmark a few months ago, we found the qps of mudoo is best, libevent is
much faster than boost asio and cppcms. We use two client servers to send
requests to one target server which runs four rest server based on mudoo,
libevent, boost:asio and cppcms one by one.

Below is our benchmark resutl.

Table 5: more details httpserver all versions
benchmarkServerCompilerOptimization
optionCpuMemDiskNetcard(in/out)Requests/seccppcms_basedclang++ 3.6.2-O3228%
/ 239% / 228%9356 / 9416 / 9416--14252 / 16124 / 15820asio_basedclang++
3.6.2-O3300% / 305% / 303%4368 / 4564 /4416--33069 / 34247 /
33360libevent_basedclang++ 3.6.2-O3763% / 764% / 764%5560 / 10M /
5520--113373 / 114072 / 113713muduo_basedclang++ 3.6.2-O3650% / 694% /
658%6272 / 6324 / 6312--303202 / 307204 / 305839
We are not  professional benchmark team, Artyom, you can do this yourself
to make sure our conclusion is correct. We can provide our rest server code
implemented by above four c++  framworks if you needed.

Hope cppcms becomes faster and faster in the future. We really love it when
developing web site. LibEvent's performance is good, but we only use it to
build rest server instead of web site because the code style is too low
level and ugly.



Dean Chen
Best regards
http://blog.csdn.net/csfreebird

On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 11:48 PM, CN <cn...@fa...> wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015, at 06:20 PM, Artyom Beilis wrote:
>
> I want you guys to looking on it - try to build the version from trunk,
> try new API *and report your impressions*.
>
>
> Hi! Artyom,
>
> It's very nice to know CppCMS is under active development :-)
>
> I have just switched to application_specific_pool and have not encountered
> any issue with this new API *during last 10 minutes* :-)
>
> Meanwhile, I want to take this chance to show off my modifications to my
> local version of rpc_json.cpp as follows:
>
> * Comment out line 162:
>    BOOSTER_DEBUG("cppcms") << "JSON-RPC Method call:" << method();
>
> * Change line 181 from
>    return_error("Invalid parameters");
>    to
>    return_error("Invalid parameters passed to JSON RPC method
> \""+method()+"\"");
>
> * Change line 191 from
>    return_error("Internal Service Error");
>    to
>    return_error("Invalid JSON RPC method: "+method());
>
> CppCMS rocks! Simply can not find a single reason not using this superb
> product and learning much C++ skills from it.
>
> Happy new year!
> CN
>
> -- http://www.fastmail.com - Email service worth paying for. Try it for free
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cppcms-users mailing list
> Cpp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users
>
>